• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Int J Infect Dis . Relative effectiveness of the adjuvanted versus non-adjuvanted seasonal influenza vaccines against severe laboratory-confirmed in

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Int J Infect Dis


. 2022 Nov 1;S1201-9712(22)00580-X.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2022.10.041. Online ahead of print.
Relative effectiveness of the adjuvanted versus non-adjuvanted seasonal influenza vaccines against severe laboratory-confirmed influenza among hospitalized Italian older adults


Alexander Domnich[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Donatella Panatto[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Elena Pariani[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Christian Napoli[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Maria Chironna[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Ilaria Manini[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Caterina Rizzo[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Andrea Orsi[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Giancarlo Icardi[SUP] 2 [/SUP], IT-BIVE-HOSP Network Study Group



Affiliations
Free article

Abstract

Objectives: In this study, we aimed to investigate the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of the MF59-adjuvanted trivalent (aTIV) and non-adjuvanted quadrivalent (QIVe) egg-based standard-dose vaccines against severe laboratory-confirmed influenza.
Methods: This test-negative case-control study was conducted in hospital setting during four recent Italian influenza seasons (from 2018/19 to 2021/22). The clinical outcome was severe acute respiratory infection (SARI) with laboratory confirmation diagnosed among subjects aged ≥ 65 years. rVE of aTIV versus QIVe was estimated through propensity score matching followed by logistic regression.
Results: Influenza virus circulated to a significant extent only during the 2018/19 and 2019/20 seasons. The final population included 512 vaccinated older adults, of which 83 were cases and 429 were test-negative controls. aTIV and QIVe users differed substantially from the point of view of several baseline characteristics. The propensity-score adjusted rVE of aTIV vs QIVe was 59.2% (95% CI: 14.6%, 80.5%), 54.7% (95% CI: -28.7%, 84.0%) and 56.9% (95% CI: -7.8%, 82.8%) against any influenza, A(H1N1)pdm09 and A(H3N2), respectively.
Conclusions: aTIV was more effective than QIVe in preventing laboratory-confirmed SARI. Benefits of aTIV may be obscured by confounding by indication.

Keywords: Adjuvanted influenza vaccine; Influenza; Influenza vaccines; Older adults; Vaccine effectiveness.
 
Back
Top Bottom