• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Int J Public Health . Factors Associated with Trust in Public Authorities Among Adults in Norway, United Kingdom, United States, and Australia Two

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Int J Public Health


. 2023 Aug 2;68:1605846.
doi: 10.3389/ijph.2023.1605846. eCollection 2023. Factors Associated with Trust in Public Authorities Among Adults in Norway, United Kingdom, United States, and Australia Two Years after the COVID-19 Outbreak

Daicia Price[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Tore Bonsaksen[SUP] 2 3 [/SUP], Janni Leung[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Caitlin McClure-Thomas[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Mary Ruffolo[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Gary Lamph[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Isaac Kabelenga[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Amy Ostertun Geirdal[SUP] 7 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to examine the levels of trust in information provided by public authorities 2 years after the COVID-19 outbreak and to examine factors associated with trust. Methods: Using a cross-national approach, online survey data was collected from four Western countries-Australia, Norway, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America. Differences in reports of very low or low levels of trust were examined by age, gender, area of residence, and the highest level of education in the four countries. Results: Levels of trust in the public authorities' information were highest among Norwegian respondents and lowest among U.K. respondents. Lower levels of trust in public authorities were found among males, individuals living in rural or remote areas, and those with lower levels of education. Conclusion: The outcomes contribute to knowledge regarding differences between socio-demographic groups and countries regarding the levels of trust people have in public authorities' information concerning a crisis, such as COVID-19. Strategies to promote trust in societies in different countries could consider these socio-demographic differences.

Keywords: coronavirus; pandemic; public authorities; trust; vaccination.

 
Back
Top Bottom