• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

J Allergy Clin Immunol . "A randomized double-blinded trial to assess recurrence of systemic allergic reactions following COVID-19 mRNA vaccination

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Allergy Clin Immunol


. 2024 Mar 7:S0091-6749(24)00236-7.
doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2024.03.001. Online ahead of print. "A randomized double-blinded trial to assess recurrence of systemic allergic reactions following COVID-19 mRNA vaccination"

Muhammad B Khalid[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Ellen Zektser[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Eric Chu[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Min Li[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Joanna Utoh[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Patrick Ryan[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Hanna S Loving[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Roa Harb[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Robbie Kattappuram[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Lindsay Chatman[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Stella Hartono[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Estefania Claudio-Etienne[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Guangping Sun[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Edward P Feener[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Zhongbo Li[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Samuel K Lai[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Quang Le[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Lawrence B Schwartz[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Jonathan J Lyons[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Hirsh Komarow[SUP] 10 [/SUP], Zhao-Hua Zhou[SUP] 11 [/SUP], Haniya Raza[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Maryland Pao[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Karen Laky[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Steven M Holland[SUP] 12 [/SUP], Erica Brittain[SUP] 13 [/SUP], Pamela A Frischmeyer-Guerrerio[SUP] 14 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Free article Abstract

Background: Systemic allergic reactions (sARs) following coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) mRNA vaccines were initially reported at a higher rate than traditional vaccines.
Objective: We aimed to evaluate the safety of revaccination in these individuals and to interrogate mechanisms underlying these reactions.
Methods: In this randomized, double-blinded, phase 2 trial, individuals 16-69 years who previously reported a convincing sAR to their first dose of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine were randomly assigned to receive second dose of BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech; Comirnaty®) vaccine and placebo on consecutive days in a blinded, 1:1 cross-over fashion at the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Five months later, an open-label BNT162b2 booster was offered if the second dose did not result in severe sAR. None of the participants received the mRNA-1273 (Moderna; Spikevax®) vaccine during the study. The primary endpoint was recurrence of sAR following second dose and booster vaccination; exploratory endpoints included biomarker measurements.
Results: Of 111 screened individuals, 18 were randomized to receive study interventions. Eight received BNT162b2 second dose followed by placebo; eight received placebo followed by BNT162b2 second dose; two withdrew before receiving any study intervention. All 16 received the booster dose. Following second dose and booster vaccination, sARs recurred in two subjects (12.5%, 95% CI 1.6-38.3). No sAR occurred after placebo. An anaphylaxis mimic, immunization stress-related response (ISRR), occurred more commonly than sARs following both vaccine and placebo and was associated with higher pre-dose anxiety scores, paresthesias, and distinct vital sign and biomarker changes.
Conclusion: Our findings support revaccination of individuals who report sARs to COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. Distinct clinical and laboratory features may distinguish sARs from ISRRs.

Keywords: Allergic reaction; Anaphylaxis; COVID-19; ISRR; Immunization Stress-Related Response; PEG; Vaccine; mRNA.

 
Back
Top Bottom