• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

J Am Med Inform Assoc . Use of clinical data to augment healthcare worker contact tracing during the COVID-19 pandemic

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Am Med Inform Assoc


. 2021 Oct 8;ocab231.
doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab231. Online ahead of print.
Use of clinical data to augment healthcare worker contact tracing during the COVID-19 pandemic


Peter Hong[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Joshua C Herigon[SUP] 3 4 [/SUP], Colby Uptegraft[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Bassem Samuel[SUP] 6 [/SUP], D Levin Brown[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Jonathan Bickel[SUP] 1 2 6 7 [/SUP], Jonathan D Hron[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Objective: This work examined the secondary use of clinical data from the electronic health record (EHR) for screening our healthcare worker (HCW) population for potential exposures to patients with coronavirus disease 2019.
Materials and methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study at a free-standing, quaternary care pediatric hospital comparing first-degree, patient-HCW pairs identified by the hospital's COVID-19 contact tracing team (CTT) to those identified using EHR clinical event data (EHR Report). The primary outcome was the number of patient-HCW pairs detected by each process.
Results: Among 233 patients with COVID-19, our EHR Report identified 4,116 patient-HCW pairs, including 2,365 (30.0%) of the 7,890 pairs detected by the CTT. The EHR Report also revealed 1,751 pairs not identified by the CTT. The highest number of patient-HCW pairs per patient was detected in the inpatient care venue. Nurses comprised the most frequently identified HCW role overall.
Conclusion: Automated methods to screen HCWs for potential exposure to patients with COVID-19 using clinical event data from the EHR are likely to improve epidemiologic surveillance by contact tracing programs and represent a viable and readily available strategy which should be considered by other institutions.

Keywords: COVID-19; clinical informatics; contact tracing; electronic health records; infection control; information technology.
 
Back
Top Bottom