• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

J Clin Microbiol . Evaluation of Serological SARS-CoV-2 Lateral Flow Assays for Rapid Point of Care Testing

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Clin Microbiol


. 2020 Nov 18;JCM.02020-20.
doi: 10.1128/JCM.02020-20. Online ahead of print.
Evaluation of Serological SARS-CoV-2 Lateral Flow Assays for Rapid Point of Care Testing


Steven E Conklin[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Kathryn Martin[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Yukari C Manabe[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Haley A Schmidt[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jernelle Miller[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Morgan Keruly[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Ethan Klock[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Charles S Kirby[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Owen R Baker[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Reinaldo E Fernandez[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Yolanda J Eby[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Justin Hardick[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Kathryn Shaw-Saliba[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Richard E Rothman[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Patrizio P Caturegli[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Andrew D Redd[SUP] 2 3 [/SUP], Aaron A R Tobian[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Evan M Bloch[SUP] 1 [/SUP], H Benjamin Larman[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Thomas C Quinn[SUP] 2 3 [/SUP], William Clarke[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Oliver Laeyendecker[SUP] 5 3 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Background. Rapid point-of-care tests (POCTs) for SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies vary in performance. A critical need exists to perform head-to-head comparison of these assays.Methods. Performance of fifteen different lateral flow POCTs for the detection of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies was performed on a well characterized set of 100 samples. Of these, 40 samples from known SARS-CoV-2-infected, convalescent individuals (average of 45 days post symptom onset) were used to assess sensitivity. Sixty samples from the pre-pandemic era (negative control), that were known to have been infected with other respiratory viruses (rhinoviruses A, B, C and/or coronavirus 229E, HKU1, NL63 OC43) were used to assess specificity. The timing of seroconversion was assessed on five LFAs on a panel of 272 longitudinal samples from 47 patients of known time since symptom onset.Results. For the assays that were evaluated, the sensitivity and specificity for any reactive band ranged from 55%-97% and 78%-100%, respectively. When assessing the performance of the IgM and the IgG bands alone, sensitivity and specificity ranged from 0%-88% and 80%-100% for IgM and 25%-95% and 90%-100% for IgG. Longitudinal testing revealed that median time post symptom onset to a positive result was 7 days (IQR 5.4, 9.8) for IgM and 8.2 days (IQR 6.3 to 11.3) for IgG.Conclusion. The testing performance varied widely among LFAs with most variation related to the sensitivity of the assays. The IgM band was most likely to misclassify pre-pandemic samples. The appearance of IgM and IgG bands occurred almost simultaneously.
 
Back
Top Bottom