• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

J Clin Microbiol . Evaluation of six commercial mid to high volume antibody and six point of care lateral flow assays for detection of SARS-CoV-2 a

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Clin Microbiol


. 2020 Jul 14;JCM.01361-20.
doi: 10.1128/JCM.01361-20. Online ahead of print.
Evaluation of six commercial mid to high volume antibody and six point of care lateral flow assays for detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies


Carmen L Charlton[SUP] 1 2 3 [/SUP], Jamil N Kanji[SUP] 4 5 [/SUP], Kam Johal[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Ashley Bailey[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Sabrina S Plitt[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Clayton MacDonald[SUP] 4 2 [/SUP], Andrea Kunst[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Emily Buss[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Laura E Burnes[SUP] 4 2 [/SUP], Kevin Fonseca[SUP] 4 8 [/SUP], Byron M Berenger[SUP] 4 9 [/SUP], Kareena Schnabl[SUP] 2 7 [/SUP], Jia Hu[SUP] 10 11 [/SUP], William Stokes[SUP] 12 [/SUP], Nathan Zelyas[SUP] 4 2 [/SUP], Graham Tipples[SUP] 4 3 13 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Background: COVID serological tests are essential to determine the overall seroprevalence of a population, and to facilitate exposure estimates within that population.Methods: We performed a head-to-head assessment of enzyme immunoassays (EIA) and point of care lateral flow assays (POCT) to detect SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Demographics, symptoms, co-morbidities, treatment, and mortality of patients whose sera was used were also reviewed.Results: Six EIAs (Abbott, Affinity, BioRad, DiaSorin, Euroimmun, and Roche), and six POCTs (BTNX, Biolidics, Deep Blue, Genrui, Getein BioTech, and Innovita) were evaluated for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in known COVID-19 infected individuals. Sensitivity of EIAs ranged from 50-100%, with only four assays having overall sensitivities >95% after 21 days post symptom onset. Notably, cross-reactivity with other respiratory viruses (PIV-4 (n=5), hMPV (n=3), rhinovirus/enterovirus (n=1), CoV-229E (n=2), CoV-NL63 (n=2), and CoV-OC43 (n=2) was observed; however, overall specificity for EIAs was good (92-100%; where all but one assay had specificity above 95%). POCTs were 0-100% sensitive >21 days post onset, with specificity ranging from 96-100%. However, many POCTs had faint banding and were often difficult to interpret.Conclusions: Serology assays can detect SARS-CoV-2 antibodies as early as 10 days post onset. Serology assays vary in their sensitivity based on the marker (IgA/M vs. IgG vs. total) and by manufacturer; however, overall only 4 EIA and 4 POCT assays had sensitivities >95% >21 days post symptom onset. Cross-reactivity with other seasonal coronaviruses is of concern. The use of serology assays should not be used for the diagnosis of acute infection, but rather for use in carefully designed serosurveys to facilitate understanding of seroprevalence in a population and to identify previous exposure to SARS-CoV-2.
 
Back
Top Bottom