• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

J Clin Virol Plus . Sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests with late convalescent sera

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Clin Virol Plus


. 2021 Sep;1(3):100038.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcvp.2021.100038. Epub 2021 Aug 18.
Sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests with late convalescent sera


Judith Kannenberg[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Carolin Schnurra[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Nina Reiners[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Reinhard Henschler[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Raymund Buhmann[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Thorsten Kaiser[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Ronald Biemann[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Mario Hönemann[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Grit Ackermann[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Henning Trawinski[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Christian Jassoy[SUP] 1 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

SARS-CoV-2-specific IgM antibodies wane during the first three months after infection and IgG antibody levels decline. This may limit the ability of antibody tests to identify previous SARS-CoV-2 infection at later time points. To examine if the diagnostic sensitivity of antibody tests falls off, we compared the sensitivity of two nucleoprotein-based antibody tests, the Roche Elecsis II Anti-SARS-CoV-2 and the Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG assay and three glycoprotein-based tests, the Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG II Quant, Siemens Atellica IM COV2T and Euroimmun SARS-CoV-2 assay with 53 sera obtained 6 months after SARS-CoV-2 infection. The sensitivity of the Roche, Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG II Quant and Siemens antibody assays was 94.3% (95% confidence interval (CI) 84.3-98.8%), 98.1 % (95% CI: 89.9-100%) and 100 % (95% CI: 93.3-100%). The sensitivity of the N-based Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG and the glycoprotein-based Euroimmun ELISA was 45.3 % (95% CI: 31.6-59.6%) and 83.3% (95% CI: 70.2-91.9%). The nucleoprotein-based Roche and the glycoprotein-based Abbott receptor binding domain (RBD) and Siemens tests were more sensitive than the N-based Abbott and the Euroimmun antibody tests (p = 0.0001 to p = 0.039). The N-based Abbott antibody test was less sensitive 6 months than 4-10 weeks after SARS-CoV-2 infection (p = 0.0001). The findings show that most SARS-CoV-2 antibody assays correctly identified previous infection 6 months after infection. The sensitivity of pan-Ig antibody tests was not reduced at 6 months when IgM antibodies have usually disappeared. However, one of the nucleoprotein-based antibody tests significantly lost diagnostic sensitivity over time.

Keywords: Antibody test; CMIA, chemiluminescence microparticle immuno-assay; COVID-19; COVID-19, Corona-virus disease 2019; ECLIA, electrochemiluminescence immunoassay; ELISA, enzyme immunoassay; Late convalescent sera; MIA, microparticle immunoassay; N, nucleoprotein; RBD, receptor binding domain; SARS-CoV-2, Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2; Sensitivity; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2).
 
Back
Top Bottom