• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

J Environ Health Sci Eng . COVID-19 aerodynamic evaluation of social distancing in indoor environments, a numerical study

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Environ Health Sci Eng


. 2021 Oct 25;1-10.
doi: 10.1007/s40201-021-00748-0. Online ahead of print.
COVID-19 aerodynamic evaluation of social distancing in indoor environments, a numerical study


A R Sarhan[SUP] 1 [/SUP], P Naser[SUP] 2 [/SUP], J Naser[SUP] 1 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Purpose: Many countries worldwide have taken early measures to combat the spread of coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 by implementing social distancing measures. The main aim of the present work is to examine the feasibility of social distancing (i.e. 1.5 m) in closed spaces taking into account the possibility for airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2.
Methods: A 3D numerical model of human respiration activities, such as breathing and speaking within indoor environments has been simulated with CFD software AVL FIRE R2020. The Eulerian-Eulerian flow model coupled with k-Ɛ approach were employed. With regard to breathing mode, the infected individual is modelled to be breathing 10 times per minute with a pulmonary rate of 6 L/min with a sinusoidal cycle. The present investigation considered air and droplets/particles as separate phases.
Results: The predicted results suggested that the social distancing (i.e. 1.5 m) is not adequate to reduce the risk of contracting diseases like COVID-19, especially when staying for a longer period in an indoor environment. The person directly facing the infected person inhaled more than 1000 aerosol droplets within 30 min. The results also showed approximately 65 % decrease in the number of inhaled droplets the room is well ventilated.
Conclusions: Within an indoor environment, 1.5 m distance will not be enough to protect the healthy individuals from the droplets coming from an infected person. Also, the situation may become worse with the change of the air ventilation system.

Keywords: Airborne transmission; CFD; COVID-19; Droplets; Indoor environments; Social distancing.
 
Back
Top Bottom