• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

J Hosp Med . Pooled Testing for SARS-CoV-2 in Hospitalized Patients

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Hosp Med


. 2020 Jul;15.
doi: 10.12788/jhm.3501.
Pooled Testing for SARS-CoV-2 in Hospitalized Patients


David Mastrianni[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Richard Falivena[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Timothy Brooks[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Brian McDermott[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Josenia Tan[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Richard Vandell[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Michael Holland[SUP] 5 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Viral testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), particularly early in the COVID-19 pandemic, was limited by supply of reagents. We pooled nasopharyngeal samples from patients at low risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection in groups of 3 for testing. Three weeks of testing using this strategy resulted in 530 patient tests in 179 cartridges; 4 positive test groups required the use of 11 additional cartridges with an overall positive rate of 0.8% in a low-risk population. This strategy resulted in the use of 340 fewer cartridges than if each test were performed on one patient sample. Pooled testing of low-risk populations allows for continued testing even when supplies are relatively scarce.
 
Back
Top Bottom