• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

J Med Virol . Evaluation of the correlation between the Access SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG II antibody tests with the SARS-CoV-2 surrogate virus neutral

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Med Virol


. 2021 Sep 15.
doi: 10.1002/jmv.27338. Online ahead of print.
Evaluation of the correlation between the Access SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG II antibody tests with the SARS-CoV-2 surrogate virus neutralization test


Yutaro Kitagawa[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Kazuo Imai[SUP] 2 3 [/SUP], Masaru Matsuoka[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Ai Fukada[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Katsumi Kubota[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Momoko Sato[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Tomohito Takada[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Sakiko Noguchi[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Norihito Tarumoto[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Shigefumi Maesaki[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Shinichi Takeuchi[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Takuya Maeda[SUP] 1 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Fully automated immunoassays for detecting severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antibodies that are strongly correlated with neutralization antibodies (nAbs) are clinically important because they enable assessment of humoral immunity after infection and vaccination. Access SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG II antibody tests are semi-quantitative, fully automated immunoassays that detect anti-receptor-binding domain (RBD) antibodies and might reflect nAb levels in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, no studies have investigated the clinical utility of these tests in association with nAbs to date. To evaluate the clinical utility of Access SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG II antibody tests and their correlation with the SARS-CoV-2 surrogate virus neutralization test (sVNT) that measures nAbs in patients with COVID-19. We analyzed 54 convalescent serum samples from COVID-19 patients and 89 serum samples from non-COVID-19 patients. The presence of anti-RBD antibodies was detected by Access SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG II antibody tests, while nAbs were measured by sVNT. The sensitivity and specificity of sVNT were 94.4% and 98.9%, respectively. There were strong positive correlations between the inhibition values of sVNT and the results of the Access SARS-CoV-2 IgM (R = 0.95, R[SUP]2[/SUP] = 0.90, p < 0.001) and IgG II antibody tests (R = 0.96, R[SUP]2[/SUP] = 0.92, p < 0.001). In terms of the presence of nAbs, the sensitivity and specificity were 98.1% and 98.9% in the IgM assay, and 100.0% and 100.0% in the IgG II assay, respectively. The Access SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG II antibody tests showed high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of nAbs in COVID-19 patients and might be alternatives for measuring nAbs. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Keywords: COVID-19; IgG; IgM; SARS-CoV-2; neutralization antibody.
 
Back
Top Bottom