• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

J Med Virol . Kinetics of IgA Subtypes and Cytokines in Respiratory Secretions Following Immunization With COVID-19 Mucosal Vaccine

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Med Virol


. 2025 Oct;97(10):e70638.
doi: 10.1002/jmv.70638. Kinetics of IgA Subtypes and Cytokines in Respiratory Secretions Following Immunization With COVID-19 Mucosal Vaccine

Weixin Chen[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Juan Li[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Shuang Bai[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Ao Zhang[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Qun Zheng[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Junnan Zhang[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Wenwen Lan[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Yihan Zhang[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Wei Yao[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Wei Zhao[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jiang Wu[SUP] 1 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic highlights the need for mucosal vaccines inducing respiratory secretory IgA (sIgA), as traditional intramuscular vaccines primarily elicit systemic IgG with limited mucosal protection. This study systematically compared mucosal immune responses induced by two authorized COVID-19 mucosal vaccines: an orally aerosolized adenovirus vector-based vaccine (Ad5-nCoV) and an intranasal live-attenuated influenza virus vector-based vaccine (dNS1-RBD). We longitudinally assessed IgA, IgA1, and IgA2 antibody titers against SARS-CoV-2 RBD/Spike protein, alongside cytokine profiles, in nasal secretions and sputum from 40 participants at 7, 14, 28 days, and 3/6 months post-immunization. The orally aerosolized vaccine exhibited superior mucosal immunogenicity, with peak IgA positive conversion rate of 50% (nasal) and 65% (sputum) vs. 30% (nasal) and 40% (sputum) for the intranasal vaccine. Notably, the orally aerosolized vaccine induced sustained IgA2 dominance (> 50%) in sputum at 6 months, whereas the intranasal vaccine showed transient IgA1 predominance followed by decline. Despite these differences, both vaccines elicited modest overall mucosal responses, with only IL-6 showing significant intergroup variation (p < 0.01). This is a study to demonstrate compartmentalized IgA subclass dynamics between upper (nasal) and lower (sputum) respiratory tracts following mucosal vaccination. Our findings highlight the need for optimized mucosal vaccine formulations to enhance respiratory immunity, providing critical insights for developing next-generation COVID-19 vaccines targeting the complex mucosal immune microenvironment.

Keywords: COVID‐19 mucosal vaccine; cytokine profiling IgA subclass kinetics; respiratory mucosal immunity.

 
Back
Top Bottom