• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

J Med Virol . Neutralizing antibody response after immunization with a COVID-19 bivalent vaccine: Insights to the future

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Med Virol


. 2024 Feb;96(2):e29416.
doi: 10.1002/jmv.29416. Neutralizing antibody response after immunization with a COVID-19 bivalent vaccine: Insights to the future

Milena Silva Souza[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Jéssica Pires Farias[SUP] 1 3 [/SUP], Robert Andreata-Santos[SUP] 3 4 [/SUP], Marianne Pereira Silva[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Ruth Dálety da Silva Brito[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Marcia Duarte Barbosa da Silva[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Cristina Mendes Peter[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Marcus Vinícius de França Cirilo[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Wilson Barros Luiz[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Alexander Birbrair[SUP] 5 6 [/SUP], Paloma Oliveira Vidal[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Maria Fernanda de Castro-Amarante[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Erika Donizetti Candido[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Aldilene Silva Munhoz[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Fernanda de Mello Malta[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Erik Gustavo Dorlass[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Rafael Rahal Guaragna Machado[SUP] 7 [/SUP], João Renato Rebello Pinho[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Danielle Bruna Leal Oliveira[SUP] 7 8 [/SUP], Edison Luiz Durigon[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Juliana Terzi Maricato[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Carla Torres Braconi[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Luís Carlos de Souza Ferreira[SUP] 3 9 [/SUP], Luiz Mário Ramos Janini[SUP] 4 10 [/SUP], Jaime Henrique Amorim[SUP] 1 2 3 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

The raising of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants led to the use of COVID-19 bivalent vaccines, which include antigens of the wild-type (WT) virus, and of the Omicron strain. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the impact of bivalent vaccination on the neutralizing antibody (NAb) response. We enrolled 93 volunteers who had received three or four doses of monovalent vaccines based on the original virus (n = 61), or a booster shot with the bivalent vaccine (n = 32). Serum samples collected from volunteers were subjected to neutralization assays using the WT SARS-CoV-2, and Omicron subvariants. In addition, immunoinformatics to quantify and localize highly conserved NAb epitopes were performed. As main result, we observed that the neutralization titers of samples from individuals vaccinated with the bivalent vaccine were higher for the original virus, in comparison to their capacity of neutralizing the Omicron variant and its subvariants. NAb that recognize epitopes mostly conserved in the WT SARS-CoV-2 were boosted, while those that recognize epitopes mostly present in the Omicron variant, and subvariants were primed. These results indicate that formulation of future vaccines shall consider to target present viruses, and not viruses that no longer circulate.

Keywords: Omicron; SARS-CoV-2; bivalent vaccine; boost; epitope.

 
Back
Top Bottom