tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
J Med Virol
. 2021 Jul 21.
doi: 10.1002/jmv.27224. Online ahead of print.
Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies Among Rural Healthcare Workers
Jordan Z Neises[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Md Saddam Hossain[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Rifat Sultana[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Kevin N Wanniarachchi[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jared W Wollman[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Eric Nelson[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Bonny L Specker[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Adam D Hoppe[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Steven R Lawson[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Natalie W Thiex[SUP] 1 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Abstract
The objective of this longitudinal cohort study was to determine the seroprevalence of antibodies to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) in healthcare workers employed at healthcare clinics in three rural counties in eastern South Dakota and western Minnesota from May 13, 2020 through December 22, 2020. Three blood draws were performed at five clinical sites and tested for the presence of antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Serum samples were tested for the presence of antibodies using a fluorescent microsphere immunoassay (FMIA), neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 Spike-pseudotyped particles (SARS-CoV-2pp) assay, and serum virus neutralization (SVN) assay. The seroprevalence was determined to be 1/336 (0.29%) for samples collected from 5/13/20-7/13/20, 5/260 (1.92%) for samples collected from 8/13/20-9/25/20, and 35/235 (14.89%) for samples collected from 10/16/20-12/22/20. Eight of the 35 (22.8%) seropositive individuals identified in the final draw did not report a previous diagnosis with COVID-19. There was a high correlation (>90%) among the FMIA and virus neutralization assays. Each clinical site's seroprevalence was higher than the cumulative incidence for the general public in each respective county as reported by state public health agencies. As of December 2020, there was a high percentage (85%) of seronegative individuals in the study population. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; Seroprevalence; healthcare worker; rural.
. 2021 Jul 21.
doi: 10.1002/jmv.27224. Online ahead of print.
Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies Among Rural Healthcare Workers
Jordan Z Neises[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Md Saddam Hossain[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Rifat Sultana[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Kevin N Wanniarachchi[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jared W Wollman[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Eric Nelson[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Bonny L Specker[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Adam D Hoppe[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Steven R Lawson[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Natalie W Thiex[SUP] 1 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 34289148
- DOI: 10.1002/jmv.27224
Abstract
The objective of this longitudinal cohort study was to determine the seroprevalence of antibodies to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) in healthcare workers employed at healthcare clinics in three rural counties in eastern South Dakota and western Minnesota from May 13, 2020 through December 22, 2020. Three blood draws were performed at five clinical sites and tested for the presence of antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Serum samples were tested for the presence of antibodies using a fluorescent microsphere immunoassay (FMIA), neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 Spike-pseudotyped particles (SARS-CoV-2pp) assay, and serum virus neutralization (SVN) assay. The seroprevalence was determined to be 1/336 (0.29%) for samples collected from 5/13/20-7/13/20, 5/260 (1.92%) for samples collected from 8/13/20-9/25/20, and 35/235 (14.89%) for samples collected from 10/16/20-12/22/20. Eight of the 35 (22.8%) seropositive individuals identified in the final draw did not report a previous diagnosis with COVID-19. There was a high correlation (>90%) among the FMIA and virus neutralization assays. Each clinical site's seroprevalence was higher than the cumulative incidence for the general public in each respective county as reported by state public health agencies. As of December 2020, there was a high percentage (85%) of seronegative individuals in the study population. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; Seroprevalence; healthcare worker; rural.