• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

J Med Virol . The swab site of the upper airways influences the diagnostic sensitivity for the omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Med Virol


. 2024 Jan;96(1):e29390.
doi: 10.1002/jmv.29390. The swab site of the upper airways influences the diagnostic sensitivity for the omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2

Fynn Atzler[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Florian Dahms[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Gregor Paul[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Stojan Perisic[SUP] 4 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

The cycle-threshold-value (C[SUB]T[/SUB] -value) is a quantitative value of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), which represents the gold standard for the detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS CoV 2). The C[SUB]T[/SUB] -value can be used to indicate the viral load in swabs of the airways. The collection of a specimen is the only part of the testing process, which is performed manually and carries, therefore, a high potential for increasing measurement variability. The comparison of different PCR results is often difficult since the exact swabbing technique of each test and how do swabs relate in a direct comparison is unknown. For these reasons, the infection course in a patient can be hard infer even after multiple swabs. As the Omicron variant spread from 06/2022 to 08/2022, all common modalities of the upper airway swabs (nasopharyngeal, oropharyngeal, combined naso-oropharyngeal, nasal orifice swabs as well as swabs of the buccal mucosa), which were performed on patients with a suspected infection with SARS CoV 2. RT-PCR was used for SARS CoV 2 RNA detection and the sample comparison was based on the C[SUB]T[/SUB] -values obtained. Viral loads can vary significantly depending on the swab sites of the upper airways. For the maximum clinical sensitivity, a combined naso-oropharyngeal swab should be considered. In case a single point and single sample measurement is the norm, a nasopharyngeal swab can deliver the highest viral load at the presumed beginning of the infection. Furthermore, the findings of this study can be valuable to correctly interpret results of different PCR with different sampling techniques.

Keywords: RNA; RT-PCR; SARS-CoV-2; omicron; swab.

 
Back
Top Bottom