• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

J Nephrol . Comparison of antibody response to two different mRNA Covid-19 vaccines in patients on hemodialysis

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Nephrol


. 2022 Jan 3.
doi: 10.1007/s40620-021-01195-8. Online ahead of print.
Comparison of antibody response to two different mRNA Covid-19 vaccines in patients on hemodialysis


Cristian Ionita[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 1 [/SUP], Daniele Marcelli[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 2 [/SUP], Cristian Nita[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Carmen Anton[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Suzana Berca[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Smaranda Vacar[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Oana Schiller[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Carmen Gheorghiu[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Claudia Barth[SUP] 8 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Introduction: In hemodialysis patients, coronavirus disease 2019 is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Aim of the study was to evaluate the antibody level against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in patients treated with two different mRNA-based vaccines, in a multicenter survey.
Patients and methods: Since April 2020, in the 5 participating Centers, periodic screening of all patients with PCR testing has been performed every 2 weeks. The study included two cohorts of patients on maintenance hemodialysis treated with the BNT162b2 or with the mRNA-1273 Covid-19 vaccine. The tests for antibodies against the receptor-binding domain was performed by the anti-SARS-CoV-2 S enzyme immunoassay (Roche Elecsys).
Results: Of the 398 included patients, 303 received the BNT162b2 and 95 the mRNA-1273 vaccine. In patients without previous infection, the median levels of anti-S antibodies were 297 U/mL and 1,032 U/mL for those treated with BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273, respectively (p < 0.001). In patients with previous infection, the median levels of SARS-CoV-2 anti-S antibodies were 7,516 U/mL and 17,495 U/mL for those treated with BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273, respectively (p = 0.005). The Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) was significantly associated with protective levels of anti-spike IgG, with 3.6% of low- or non-responders having a CCI of 2-4 versus 18.9% in those with a CCI of 8 or more. The adjusted OR of developing a sufficient antibody level between the two vaccines was 3.91 (p = 0.0766) in favor of mRNA-1273.
Conclusions: Both of the evaluated mRNA-based vaccines for SARS-CoV-2 showed good efficacy. Preliminary data may data suggest a higher antibody response to the mRNA-1273 vaccine.

Keywords: Hemodialysis patients; Humoral response; SARS-Cov-2 vaccination; mRNA-based SARS-Cov-2 vaccine.
 
Back
Top Bottom