• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

J Pediatr Hematol Oncol . Influenza Vaccination Receipt in Pediatric Patients With Cancer or Sickle Cell Disease

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Pediatr Hematol Oncol


. 2022 Oct 3.
doi: 10.1097/MPH.0000000000002559. Online ahead of print.
Influenza Vaccination Receipt in Pediatric Patients With Cancer or Sickle Cell Disease


J Nathan Yarnall[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Ann Mertens[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Marianne Yee[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Evan Orenstein[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Kristina W Lai[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Karen Wasilewski-Masker[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Background: Influenza causes greater morbidity in children with cancer or sickle cell disease (SCD). Literature on influenza vaccination receipt for these populations is limited in low-vaccination states. Outpatient interventions improve vaccine receipt but isolated inpatient interventions remain unstudied.
Procedure: We reviewed influenza vaccine receipt of children with cancer or SCD treated at Children's Healthcare of Atlanta during three influenza seasons. We implemented a clinical decision support intervention during an influenza season and compared influenza vaccine receipt preintervention and postintervention among admitted children.
Results: The oncology cohort (N=1548, 60% to 62%) and the SCD cohort (N=2549, 61% to 65%) had similar-to-higher vaccination receipt to the United States (58% to 64%, P=0.01 to 0.79) and Georgia (51% to 56%, P<0.01). The intervention did not significantly improve vaccination receipt for admitted children with cancer (40% vs. 56%, P=0.05 to 0.88) or SCD (44% vs. 56%, P=0.01). Regression modeling also found no significant increase in vaccine receipt (hematologic malignancy: 0.8 [0.73 to 0.98], solid tumor: 0.9 [0.80 to 1.90], central nervous system tumor: 0.9 [0.71 to 1.14], SCD: 0.9 [0.85 to 0.99]).
Conclusions: Children with cancer and SCD have similar-to-greater influenza vaccination receipt compared with Georgia and the United States. An inpatient intervention did not significantly improve influenza vaccine receipt in these patient cohorts. Future studies are needed to identify alternative approaches to improving vaccine receipt in these cohorts.
 
Back
Top Bottom