• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

JAMA Intern Med . Association of SARS-CoV-2 Seropositive Antibody Test With Risk of Future Infection

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
JAMA Intern Med


. 2021 Feb 24.
doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.0366. Online ahead of print.
Association of SARS-CoV-2 Seropositive Antibody Test With Risk of Future Infection


Raymond A Harvey[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jeremy A Rassen[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Carly A Kabelac[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Wendy Turenne[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Sandy Leonard[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Reyna Klesh[SUP] 2 [/SUP], William A Meyer 3rd[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Harvey W Kaufman, Steve Anderson[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Oren Cohen[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Valentina I Petkov[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Kathy A Cronin[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Alison L Van Dyke[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Douglas R Lowy[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Norman E Sharpless[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Lynne T Penberthy[SUP] 5 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Importance: Understanding the effect of serum antibodies to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) on susceptibility to infection is important for identifying at-risk populations and could have implications for vaccine deployment.
Objective: The study purpose was to evaluate evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection based on diagnostic nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) among patients with positive vs negative test results for antibodies in an observational descriptive cohort study of clinical laboratory and linked claims data.
Design, setting, and participants: The study created cohorts from a deidentified data set composed of commercial laboratory tests, medical and pharmacy claims, electronic health records, and hospital chargemaster data. Patients were categorized as antibody-positive or antibody-negative according to their first SARS-CoV-2 antibody test in the database.
Main outcomes and measures: Primary end points were post-index diagnostic NAAT results, with infection defined as a positive diagnostic test post-index, measured in 30-day intervals (0-30, 31-60, 61-90, >90 days). Additional measures included demographic, geographic, and clinical characteristics at the time of the index antibody test, including recorded signs and symptoms or prior evidence of coronavirus 2019 (COVID) diagnoses or positive NAAT results and recorded comorbidities.
Results: The cohort included 3 257 478 unique patients with an index antibody test; 56% were female with a median (SD) age of 48 (20) years. Of these, 2 876 773 (88.3%) had a negative index antibody result, and 378 606 (11.6%) had a positive index antibody result. Patients with a negative antibody test result were older than those with a positive result (mean age 48 vs 44 years). Of index-positive patients, 18.4% converted to seronegative over the follow-up period. During the follow-up periods, the ratio (95% CI) of positive NAAT results among individuals who had a positive antibody test at index vs those with a negative antibody test at index was 2.85 (95% CI, 2.73-2.97) at 0 to 30 days, 0.67 (95% CI, 0.6-0.74) at 31 to 60 days, 0.29 (95% CI, 0.24-0.35) at 61 to 90 days, and 0.10 (95% CI, 0.05-0.19) at more than 90 days.
Conclusions and relevance: In this cohort study, patients with positive antibody test results were initially more likely to have positive NAAT results, consistent with prolonged RNA shedding, but became markedly less likely to have positive NAAT results over time, suggesting that seropositivity is associated with protection from infection. The duration of protection is unknown, and protection may wane over time.
 
Back
Top Bottom