• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

JAMA Netw Open . Plastic Waste and COVID-19 Incidence Among Hospital Staff After Deescalation in PPE Use

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
JAMA Netw Open


. 2025 Apr 1;8(4):e255264.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.5264. Plastic Waste and COVID-19 Incidence Among Hospital Staff After Deescalation in PPE Use

Stephanie Sutjipto[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Aung Hein Aung[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Margaret M L Soon[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Chen Jing[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Brenda S P Ang[SUP] 1 2 4 5 6 [/SUP], Sapna P Sadarangani[SUP] 1 2 5 [/SUP], Kai Wei Chong[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Oon Tek Ng[SUP] 1 2 5 6 [/SUP], Kalisvar Marimuthu[SUP] 1 2 6 [/SUP], Wei Yen Lim[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Angela Chow[SUP] 3 5 7 [/SUP], Shawn Vasoo[SUP] 1 2 5 6 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

Importance: In September 2023, the Singapore Ministry of Health revised the national personal protective equipment (PPE) guideline for health care personnel (HCP) attending to suspected or confirmed patients with COVID-19, recommending the use of N95 respirators alone. However, data on the associations between PPE deescalation, staff COVID-19 incidence, and sustainability outcomes are limited.
Objective: To evaluate the associations between PPE deescalation guidelines on staff COVID-19 incidence and the environmental sustainability outcomes of the measure.
Design, setting, and participants: This was a retrospective quality improvement study of hospital PPE usage using data from Tan Tock Seng Hospital and the National Centre for Infectious Diseases (NCID), analyzing monthly COVID-19 incidence rates among HCP (all medical staff, allied health care workers, ancillary staff, and administrative staff from the hospital campus) and in the community over 12 months before and after PPE deescalation measures (October 2021 to September 2022 and October 2022 to September 2023).
Main outcomes and measures: COVID-19 incidence rates among HCP and in the community; economic and environmental outcomes of removing single-use gowns from routine COVID-19 care, including reductions in carbon footprint, plastic waste generation, and cost savings.
Results: The mean (SD) monthly number of HCP was 10 774 (79) (range, 10 636-10 891) preimplementation and 11 099 (200) (range, 10 864-11 449) postimplementation. Our analysis revealed PPE deescalation was not associated with an increase in monthly COVID-19 infections among hospital staff, with the trends aligning with population infection rates. The median (IQR) staff COVID-19 infection rate relative to the community COVID-19 infection rate was 2.6 (1.9-3.6) preimplementation compared with 1.5 (0.9-3.1) postimplementation. An estimated 4 gowns per patient-day were saved, totaling 440 532 gowns over 12 months. This equated to an estimated reduction in health care costs by SGD 453 748 (approximately USD 333 970) and reductions of 398 681.46 kg carbon dioxide equivalent in carbon emissions and 66 080 kg of plastic waste.
Conclusions and relevance: This quality improvement study of hospital PPE usage observed that the national PPE deescalation guidelines corresponded with the reductions in protective gown use, associated costs, carbon footprint, and plastic waste generation with no apparent compromise to staff safety and health.


 
Back
Top Bottom