• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

JMIR Public Health Surveill Online National Health Agency Mask Guidance for the Public in Light of COVID-19: A Content Analysis

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
JMIR Public Health Surveill


. 2020 May 18.
doi: 10.2196/19501. Online ahead of print.
Online National Health Agency Mask Guidance for the Public in Light of COVID-19: A Content Analysis


Linnea Laestadius[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Yang Wang[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Ziyad Ben Taleb[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Mohammad Ebrahimi Kalan[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Young Cho[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jennifer Manganello[SUP] 4 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Background: The rapid global spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has compelled national governments to issue guidance on the use of face masks for members of the general public. To date, no work has assessed how this guidance differs across governments.
Objective: This study seeks to contribute to a rational and consistent global response to infectious disease by determining how guidelines differ across nations and regions.
Methods: A content analysis of health agency mask guidelines on agency websites was performed in late March 2020 among 25 countries/regions with large numbers of COVID-19 cases. Countries/regions were assigned across the coding team by language proficiency, with Google Translate used as needed. When available, both the original and English language version of guidance were reviewed.
Results: All examined countries/regions had some form of guidance online, although detail and clarity differed. While nine countries/regions recommended surgical, medical, or unspecified masks in public and/or poorly ventilated places, sixteen recommended against people wearing masks in public. Two explicitly recommended against fabric masks. Twelve failed to outline the minimum basic World Health Organization guidance for masks.
Conclusions: Online guidelines for face mask use to prevent COVID-19 in the general public are currently inconsistent across nations/regions and have been changing often. Efforts to create greater standardization and clarity should be explored in light of the status of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
 
Back
Top Bottom