• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Jpn J Radiol . Comparison of CT findings of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia caused by different major variants

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Jpn J Radiol


. 2022 Jun 28.
doi: 10.1007/s11604-022-01301-1. Online ahead of print.
Comparison of CT findings of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia caused by different major variants


Shohei Inui[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Akira Fujikawa[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Wataru Gonoi[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Shuichi Kawano[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Keita Sakurai[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Yuto Uchida[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Masanori Ishida[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Osamu Abe[SUP] 4 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Purpose: To explore the CT findings and pneumonnia progression pattern of the Alpha and Delta variants of SARS-CoV-2 by comparing them with the pre-existing wild type.
Method: In this retrospective comparative study, a total of 392 patients with COVID-19 were included: 118 patients with wild type (70 men, 56.8 ± 20.7 years), 137 with Alpha variant (93 men, 49.4 ± 17.0 years), and 137 with Delta variant (94 men, 45.4 ± 12.4). Chest CT evaluation included opacities and repairing changes as well as lesion distribution and laterality. Chest CT severity score was also calculated. These parameters were statistically compared across the variants.
Results: Ground glass opacity (GGO) with consolidation and repairing changes were more frequent in the order of Delta variant, Alpha variant, and wild type throughout the disease course. Delta variant showed GGO with consolidation more conspicuously than did the other two on days 1-4 (vs. wild type, Bonferroni corrected p = 0.01; vs. Alpha variant, Bonferroni corrected p = 0.003) and days 5-8 (vs. wild type, Bonferroni corrected p < 0.001; vs. Alpha variant, Bonferroni corrected-p = 0.003). Total lung CT severity scores of Delta variant were higher than those of wild type on days 1-4 and 5-8 (Bonferroni corrected p = 0.01 and Bonferroni corrected p = 0.005, respectively) and that of Alpha variant on days 1-4 (Bonferroni corrected p = 0.002). There was no difference in the CT findings between wild type and Alpha variant.
Conclusions: Pneumonia progression of Delta variant may be more rapid and severe in the early stage than in the other two.

Keywords: 2019 novel coronavirus; Alpha variant; COVID-19; CT; Delta variant; SARS-CoV-2.
 
Back
Top Bottom