• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Lab Med . Evaluation of RT-LAMP Assay for Rapid Detection of SARS-CoV-2

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Lab Med


. 2022 Jul 16;lmac030.
doi: 10.1093/labmed/lmac030. Online ahead of print.
Evaluation of RT-LAMP Assay for Rapid Detection of SARS-CoV-2


Ya-Ping Li[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Xun-Jie Cao[SUP] 1 3 [/SUP], Xin Luo[SUP] 1 3 [/SUP], Tian-Ao Xie[SUP] 1 3 [/SUP], Wan-Jun Liu[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Shi-Ming Xie[SUP] 1 4 [/SUP], Min Lin[SUP] 1 5 [/SUP], Xu-Guang Guo[SUP] 1 3 6 7 8 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of the reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) assay for rapid detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in community or primary-care settings.
Method: We systematically searched the Web of Science, Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases. We conducted quality evaluation using ReviewManager software (version 5.0). We then used MetaDisc software (version 1.4) and Stata software (version 12.0) to build forest plots, along with a Deeks funnel plot and a bivariate boxplot for analysis.
Result: Overall, the sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio were 0.79, 0.97, and 328.18, respectively. The sensitivity for the subgroup with RNA extraction appeared to be higher, at 0.88 (0.86-0.90), compared to the subgroup without RNA extraction, at 0.50 (0.45-0.55), with no significant difference in specificity.
Conclusion: RT-LAMP assay exhibited high specificity regarding current SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, its overall sensitivity was relatively moderate. Extracting RNA was found to be beneficial in improving sensitivity.

Keywords: COVID-19; COVID-19 diagnostic testing; LAMP assay; SARS-CoV-2; meta-analysis; severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.
 
Back
Top Bottom