• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Lancet . Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine effectiveness against RSV-associated hospitalisations and emergency department encounters among a

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Lancet


. 2024 Oct 19;404(10462):1547-1559.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01738-0. Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine effectiveness against RSV-associated hospitalisations and emergency department encounters among adults aged 60 years and older in the USA, October, 2023, to March, 2024: a test-negative design analysis

Amanda B Payne[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Janet A Watts[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Patrick K Mitchell[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Kristin Dascomb[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Stephanie A Irving[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Nicola P Klein[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Shaun J Grannis[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Toan C Ong[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Sarah W Ball[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Malini B DeSilva[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Karthik Natarajan[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Tamara Sheffield[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Daniel Bride[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Julie Arndorfer[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Allison L Naleway[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Padma Koppolu[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Bruce Fireman[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Ousseny Zerbo[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Julius Timbol[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Kristin Goddard[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Brian E Dixon[SUP] 10 [/SUP], William F Fadel[SUP] 11 [/SUP], Colin Rogerson[SUP] 12 [/SUP], Katie S Allen[SUP] 10 [/SUP], Suchitra Rao[SUP] 7 [/SUP], David Mayer[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Michelle Barron[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Sarah E Reese[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Elizabeth A K Rowley[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Morgan Najdowski[SUP] 13 [/SUP], Allison Avrich Ciesla[SUP] 13 [/SUP], Josephine Mak[SUP] 14 [/SUP], Emily L Reeves[SUP] 14 [/SUP], Omobosola O Akinsete[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Charlene E McEvoy[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Inih J Essien[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Mark W Tenforde[SUP] 14 [/SUP], Katherine E Fleming-Dutra[SUP] 14 [/SUP], Ruth Link-Gelles[SUP] 15 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

Background: Respiratory syncytial virus vaccines first recommended for use during 2023 were efficacious against lower respiratory tract disease in clinical trials. Limited real-world data regarding respiratory syncytial virus vaccine effectiveness are available. To inform vaccine policy and address gaps in evidence from the clinical trials, we aimed to assess the effectiveness against respiratory syncytial virus-associated hospitalisations and emergency department encounters among adults aged at least 60 years.
Methods: We conducted a test-negative design analysis in an electronic health records-based network in eight states in the USA, including hospitalisations and emergency department encounters with respiratory syncytial virus-like illness among adults aged at least 60 years who underwent respiratory syncytial virus testing from Oct 1, 2023, to March 31, 2024. Respiratory syncytial virus vaccination status at the time of the encounter was derived from electronic health record documentation, state and city immunisation registries, and, for some sites, medical claims. Vaccine effectiveness was estimated by immunocompromise status, comparing the odds of vaccination among respiratory syncytial virus-positive case patients and respiratory syncytial virus-negative control patients, and adjusting for age, race and ethnicity, sex, calendar day, social vulnerability index, number of underlying non-respiratory medical conditions, presence of respiratory underlying medical conditions, and geographical region.
Findings: Among 28 271 hospitalisations for respiratory syncytial virus-like illness among adults aged at least 60 years without immunocompromising conditions, vaccine effectiveness was 80% (95% CI 71-85) against respiratory syncytial virus-associated hospitalisations, and vaccine effectiveness was 81% (52-92) against respiratory syncytial virus-associated critical illness (ICU admission or death, or both). Among 8435 hospitalisations for respiratory syncytial virus-like illness among adults with immunocompromising conditions, vaccine effectiveness was 73% (48-85) against associated hospitalisation. Among 36 521 emergency department encounters for respiratory syncytial virus-like illness among adults aged at least 60 years without an immunocompromising condition, vaccine effectiveness was 77% (70-83) against respiratory syncytial virus-associated emergency department encounters. Vaccine effectiveness estimates were similar by age group and product type.
Interpretation: Respiratory syncytial virus vaccination was effective in preventing respiratory syncytial virus-associated hospitalisations and emergency department encounters among adults aged at least 60 years in the USA during the 2023-24 respiratory syncytial virus season, which was the first season after respiratory syncytial virus vaccine was approved.
Funding: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.


 
Back
Top Bottom