• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Math Biosci Eng . Two waves of COIVD-19 in Brazilian cities and vaccination impact

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Math Biosci Eng


. 2022 Mar 9;19(5):4657-4671.
doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022216.
Two waves of COIVD-19 in Brazilian cities and vaccination impact


Lixin Lin[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Boqiang Chen[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Yanji Zhao[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Weiming Wang[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Daihai He[SUP] 1 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Backgrounds: Brazil has suffered two waves of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). The second wave, coinciding with the spread of the Gamma variant, was more severe than the first wave. Studies have not yet reached a conclusion on some issues including the extent of reinfection, the infection fatality rate (IFR), the infection attack rate (IAR) and the effects of the vaccination campaign in Brazil, though it was reported that confirmed reinfection was at a low level.
Methods: We modify the classical Susceptible-Exposed-Infectious-Recovered (SEIR) model with additional class for severe cases, vaccination and time-varying transmission rates. We fit the model to the severe acute respiratory infection (SARI) deaths, which is a proxy of the COVID-19 deaths, in 20 Brazilian cities with the large number of death tolls. We evaluate the vaccination effect by a contrast of "with" vaccination actual scenario and "without" vaccination in a counterfactual scenario. We evaluate the model performance when the reinfection is absent in the model.
Results: In the 20 Brazilian cities, the model simulated death matched the reported deaths reasonably well. The effect of the vaccination varies across cities. The estimated median IFR is around 1.2%.
Conclusion: Overall, through this modeling exercise, we conclude that the effects of vaccination campaigns vary across cites and the reinfection is not crucial for the second wave. The relatively high IFR could be due to the breakdown of medical system in many cities.

Keywords: COVID-19; breakthrough infection; mathematical modelling; reinfection; vaccination effectiveness.
 
Back
Top Bottom