• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

MedComm (2020) . Criteria for judging the immune markers of COVID-19 disease vaccines

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
MedComm (2020)


. 2021 Dec 31;3(1):1-12.
doi: 10.1002/mco2.109. eCollection 2022 Jan.
Criteria for judging the immune markers of COVID-19 disease vaccines


Nan Lin[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Haoxuan Fu[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Dan Pu[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Yuxin Quan[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Yueyi Li[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Xiaomeng Yin[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Yuhao Wei[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Hang Wang[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Xuelei Ma[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Xiawei Wei[SUP] 5 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

As severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) sweeping the world, effective and affordable vaccines are in urgent need. A reliable system for the assessment of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines would boost the development of vaccines and reduce the research cost. We constructed a logistic regression model and analyzed the relationship between antibody (Ab) level and efficacy of different vaccine types. The relationship between assessment dates and Ab levels was depicted by plotting the mean of Ab levels evolved over time and a fitted cubic polynomial model. Anti-spike immunoglobulin G (IgG) could best estimate the vaccine efficacy (VE) (adjusted R [SUP]2[/SUP] = 0.731) and neutralizing Ab to live SARS-CoV-2 also explained a fine relationship (adjusted R [SUP]2 [/SUP]= 0.577). Neutralizing Abs to live SARS-CoV-2 in inactivated virus vaccines reached a peak during days 40-60, and their receptor-binding domain (RBD)-IgG peaked during days 40-50. For messenger RNA (mRNA) and viral vector vaccines, their neutralizing Ab to live SARS-CoV-2 peaked later than day 40, and for RBD-IgG during days 30-50. For mRNA and viral vector vaccines, their peak time of Abs was later than that in inactivated virus vaccines. RBD-IgG peaked earlier than Ab to live SARS-CoV-2. Anti-spike IgG and Ab to live SARS-CoV-2 may be good immune markers for VE assessment.

Keywords: SARS‐CoV‐2; assessment; neutralizing antibodies; vaccine.
 
Back
Top Bottom