sharon sanders
Editor-in-Chief & President
A One Health Investigation into H5N1 Avian Influenza Virus Epizootics on Two Dairy Farms
Ismaila Shittu, Diego Silva, Judith U. Oguzie, Lyudmyla V. Marushchak, Gene G. Olinger, John A. Lednicky, Claudia M. Trujillo-Vargas, Nicholas E. Schneider, Haiping Hao, View ORCID ProfileGregory C. Gray
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.27.24310982
Abstract
Background: In early April 2024 we studied two Texas dairy farms which had suffered incursions of H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza virus (HPAIV) the previous month. Methods: We employed molecular assays, cell and egg culture, Sanger and next generation sequencing to isolate and characterize viruses from multiple farm specimens (cow nasal swab, milk specimens, fecal slurry, and a dead bird). Results: We detected H5N1 HPAIV in 64% (9/14) of milk specimens, 2.6% (1/39) of cattle nasal swab specimens, and none of 17 cattle worker nasopharyngeal swab specimens. We cultured and characterized virus from eight H5N1-positive specimens. Sanger and next-generation sequencing revealed the viruses were closely related into other recent Texas epizootic H5N1 strains of clade 2.3.4.4b. Our isolates had multiple mutations associated with increased spillover potential. Surprisingly, we detected SARS-CoV-2 in a nasal swab from a sick cow. Additionally, 14.3% (2/14) of the farm workers who donated sera were recently symptomatic and had elevated neutralizing antibodies against a related H5N1 strain. Conclusions: While our sampling was limited, these data offer additional insight into the large H5N1 HPAIV epizootic which thus far has impacted at least 96 cattle farms in twelve US states. Due to fears that research might damage dairy businesses, studies like this one have been few. We need to find ways to work with dairy farms in collecting more comprehensive epidemiological data that are necessary for the design of future interventions against H5N1 HPAIV on cattle farms.
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.07.27.24310982v1
from pdf:
snip
"Additionally, in one of the only serological studies of dairy workers during this epizootic, two (20%) of 10 dairy workers from Farm A who donated sera had evidence of elevated titers against a recombinant H5N1 virus of clade 2.3.4.4b virus by a MN assay. The first of these dairy workers had a moderately elevated MN titer of 1:40. He often worked inside cattle corrals close to dairy cattle. He reported no respiratory illnesses during the last 12 months but reported having a cough and taking cough medication at the time we enrolled him.
The second worker had a MN of 1:80. She worked in the Farm A’s cafeteria. She reported experiencing fever, cough or sore throat during that last 12 months as well as being around others at work with similar respiratory signs and symptoms. She had just recovered from a respiratory illness when we enrolled her. While we cannot rule out cross-reacting antibodies from previous influenza A virus infections or vaccines as a cause for the MN titer elevations, neutralizing assays are often considered the best assay for the virus-specific serological assessments. We observe that workers in Farm A had more time (~4 weeks) to develop antibodies to the H5N1 virus as compared to workers on Farm B (~2 weeks) as Farm A experienced the H5N1 epizootic 14 days earlier than Farm B."
----------------------------------------------------------
H5N1 in the US dairy cow outbreaks is known to spread via fomites i.e. contact with contaminated surfaces. I am not aware of any of the family of the confirmed H5N1 positive workers in Colorado to have tested positive for H5N1. i.e. people with no direct contact to the cows or farm environment but are a close contact of someone who had access.
Time will tell.
Please use more than one source for your information.
Ismaila Shittu, Diego Silva, Judith U. Oguzie, Lyudmyla V. Marushchak, Gene G. Olinger, John A. Lednicky, Claudia M. Trujillo-Vargas, Nicholas E. Schneider, Haiping Hao, View ORCID ProfileGregory C. Gray
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.27.24310982
Abstract
Background: In early April 2024 we studied two Texas dairy farms which had suffered incursions of H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza virus (HPAIV) the previous month. Methods: We employed molecular assays, cell and egg culture, Sanger and next generation sequencing to isolate and characterize viruses from multiple farm specimens (cow nasal swab, milk specimens, fecal slurry, and a dead bird). Results: We detected H5N1 HPAIV in 64% (9/14) of milk specimens, 2.6% (1/39) of cattle nasal swab specimens, and none of 17 cattle worker nasopharyngeal swab specimens. We cultured and characterized virus from eight H5N1-positive specimens. Sanger and next-generation sequencing revealed the viruses were closely related into other recent Texas epizootic H5N1 strains of clade 2.3.4.4b. Our isolates had multiple mutations associated with increased spillover potential. Surprisingly, we detected SARS-CoV-2 in a nasal swab from a sick cow. Additionally, 14.3% (2/14) of the farm workers who donated sera were recently symptomatic and had elevated neutralizing antibodies against a related H5N1 strain. Conclusions: While our sampling was limited, these data offer additional insight into the large H5N1 HPAIV epizootic which thus far has impacted at least 96 cattle farms in twelve US states. Due to fears that research might damage dairy businesses, studies like this one have been few. We need to find ways to work with dairy farms in collecting more comprehensive epidemiological data that are necessary for the design of future interventions against H5N1 HPAIV on cattle farms.
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.07.27.24310982v1
from pdf:
snip
"Additionally, in one of the only serological studies of dairy workers during this epizootic, two (20%) of 10 dairy workers from Farm A who donated sera had evidence of elevated titers against a recombinant H5N1 virus of clade 2.3.4.4b virus by a MN assay. The first of these dairy workers had a moderately elevated MN titer of 1:40. He often worked inside cattle corrals close to dairy cattle. He reported no respiratory illnesses during the last 12 months but reported having a cough and taking cough medication at the time we enrolled him.
The second worker had a MN of 1:80. She worked in the Farm A’s cafeteria. She reported experiencing fever, cough or sore throat during that last 12 months as well as being around others at work with similar respiratory signs and symptoms. She had just recovered from a respiratory illness when we enrolled her. While we cannot rule out cross-reacting antibodies from previous influenza A virus infections or vaccines as a cause for the MN titer elevations, neutralizing assays are often considered the best assay for the virus-specific serological assessments. We observe that workers in Farm A had more time (~4 weeks) to develop antibodies to the H5N1 virus as compared to workers on Farm B (~2 weeks) as Farm A experienced the H5N1 epizootic 14 days earlier than Farm B."
----------------------------------------------------------
H5N1 in the US dairy cow outbreaks is known to spread via fomites i.e. contact with contaminated surfaces. I am not aware of any of the family of the confirmed H5N1 positive workers in Colorado to have tested positive for H5N1. i.e. people with no direct contact to the cows or farm environment but are a close contact of someone who had access.
Time will tell.
Please use more than one source for your information.