• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

N Engl J Med . Protection against SARS-CoV-2 after Covid-19 Vaccination and Previous Infection

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
N Engl J Med


. 2022 Feb 16.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2118691. Online ahead of print.
Protection against SARS-CoV-2 after Covid-19 Vaccination and Previous Infection


Victoria Hall[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Sarah Foulkes[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Ferdinando Insalata[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Peter Kirwan[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Ayoub Saei[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Ana Atti[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Edgar Wellington[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jameel Khawam[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Katie Munro[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Michelle Cole[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Caio Tranquillini[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Andrew Taylor-Kerr[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Nipunadi Hettiarachchi[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Davina Calbraith[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Noshin Sajedi[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Iain Milligan[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Yrene Themistocleous[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Diane Corrigan[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Lisa Cromey[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Lesley Price[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Sally Stewart[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Elen de Lacy[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Chris Norman[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Ezra Linley[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Ashley D Otter[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Amanda Semper[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jacqueline Hewson[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Silvia D'Arcangelo[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Meera Chand[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Colin S Brown[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Tim Brooks[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jasmin Islam[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Andre Charlett[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Susan Hopkins[SUP] 1 [/SUP], SIREN Study Group



Affiliations

Abstract

Background: The duration and effectiveness of immunity from infection with and vaccination against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are relevant to pandemic policy interventions, including the timing of vaccine boosters.
Methods: We investigated the duration and effectiveness of immunity in a prospective cohort of asymptomatic health care workers in the United Kingdom who underwent routine polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR) testing. Vaccine effectiveness (≤10 months after the first dose of vaccine) and infection-acquired immunity were assessed by comparing the time to PCR-confirmed infection in vaccinated persons with that in unvaccinated persons, stratified according to previous infection status. We used a Cox regression model with adjustment for previous SARS-CoV-2 infection status, vaccine type and dosing interval, demographic characteristics, and workplace exposure to SARS-CoV-2.
Results: Of 35,768 participants, 27% (9488) had a previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. Vaccine coverage was high: 97% of the participants had received two doses (78% had received BNT162b2 vaccine [Pfizer-BioNTech] with a long interval between doses, 9% BNT162b2 vaccine with a short interval between doses, and 8% ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine [AstraZeneca]). Between December 7, 2020, and September 21, 2021, a total of 2747 primary infections and 210 reinfections were observed. Among previously uninfected participants who received long-interval BNT162b2 vaccine, adjusted vaccine effectiveness decreased from 85% (95% confidence interval [CI], 72 to 92) 14 to 73 days after the second dose to 51% (95% CI, 22 to 69) at a median of 201 days (interquartile range, 197 to 205) after the second dose; this effectiveness did not differ significantly between the long-interval and short-interval BNT162b2 vaccine recipients. At 14 to 73 days after the second dose, adjusted vaccine effectiveness among ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine recipients was 58% (95% CI, 23 to 77) - considerably lower than that among BNT162b2 vaccine recipients. Infection-acquired immunity waned after 1 year in unvaccinated participants but remained consistently higher than 90% in those who were subsequently vaccinated, even in persons infected more than 18 months previously.
Conclusions: Two doses of BNT162b2 vaccine were associated with high short-term protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection; this protection waned considerably after 6 months. Infection-acquired immunity boosted with vaccination remained high more than 1 year after infection. (Funded by the U.K. Health Security Agency and others; ISRCTN Registry number, ISRCTN11041050.).
 
Back
Top Bottom