• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

N-Glycosylation of Seasonal Influenza Vaccine Hemagglutinins: Implication for potency testing and immune processing

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Virol. 2018 Oct 24. pii: JVI.01693-18. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01693-18. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]N-Glycosylation of Seasonal Influenza Vaccine Hemagglutinins: Implication for potency testing and immune processing.[/h] An Y[SUP]1[/SUP], Parsons LM[SUP]2[/SUP], Jankowska E[SUP]2[/SUP], Melnyk D[SUP]3[/SUP], Joshi M[SUP]3[/SUP], Cipollo JF[SUP]4[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] Prior to each annual flu season, health authorities recommend three or four virus strains for inclusion in the annual influenza vaccine: a Type A:H1N1, a Type A:H3N2, and one or two Type B viruses. Antigenic differences between strains are found in the glycosylation patterns of the major influenza antigen, hemagglutinin (HA). Here we examine the glycosylation patterns of seven reference antigens containing HA used in influenza vaccine potency testing. These reagents are supplied by the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) or the National Institute for Biological Standards and Control (NIBSC) for use in vaccine testing. Those produced in hen egg, Madin Darby Canine Kidney (MDCK), and insect (Sf9) expression systems were examined. They are closely related or identical to antigens used in commercial vaccine. Reference antigens studied were used in the 2014-2015 influenza season and included A/California/07/2009 H1N1, A/Texas/50/2012 H3N2 and B/Massachusetts/02/2012. Released glycan and HA specific glycopeptide glycosylation patterns were examined. Also examined was the sensitivity of the Single Radial Immunodiffusion Assay (SRID) potency test to differences in HA antigen glycosylation. The SRID assay was not sensitive to any HA antigen glycosylation status from any cell system based on deglycosylation studies as applied using standard assay procedures. Mapping of glycosites with their occupying glycan to functional regions, including antigenic sites, lectin interaction regions and fusion domains was performed and has implications for immune processing, immune response and antigenic shielding. Differences in glycosylation patterns, as dictated by cell system used in expression, may impact on these functions.IMPORTANCE Here the glycosylation patterns of the 2014-2015 influenza vaccine season standard antigens A/California/07/2009 H1N1, A/Texas/50/2012 H3N2, and B/Massachusetts/02/2012 were revealed and sensitivity of the Single Radial Immunodiffusion Assay (SRID) potency test glycosylation was tested. Differences in hemagglutinin glycosylation site composition and heterogeneity seen in antigen produced in different cell substrates suggests differences in processing and downstream immune response. The SRID potency test used in vaccine release, is not sensitive to differences in glycosylation when applied under standard use conditions. This work reveals important differences in vaccine antigens and may point toward areas where improvements may be made concerning vaccine antigen preparation, immune processing and testing.


PMID: 30355697 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.01693-18
Free full text
 
Back
Top Bottom