• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

NEJM: Combating Emerging Threats ? Accelerating the Availability of Medical Therapies

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
[h=1]Combating Emerging Threats ? Accelerating the Availability of Medical Therapies[/h] Luciana Borio, M.D., Edward Cox, M.D., M.P.H., and Nicole Lurie, M.D., M.S.P.H.
August 5, 2015DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp1508708
Share:







Article Life-threatening emerging or reemerging infectious diseases increasingly inspire demands for access to novel, often untested therapies. Recent concern about transmission of the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) in Asia underscores the need to rapidly evaluate investigational therapies during outbreaks, identify those that actually benefit patients, and protect against those that cause harm. Although a traditional sequence of studies in animals followed by phased clinical trials works well for many therapeutics, that process may be too slow during public health emergencies. We propose establishing a new paradigm for accelerating evaluation of investigational therapies during public health emergencies so that therapies shown to be safe and effective can reach patients as soon as possible.
The primary approach to containing outbreaks of emerging infectious diseases involves standard public health measures, such as identifying and isolating infected persons, tracing their contacts to detect secondary infections, and protecting contacts and health care workers from exposure. General supportive medical care for anyone who becomes infected is essential, in addition to use of any proven specific treatments. When such treatments are lacking, clinicians commonly try therapies on the basis of experience with other diseases (usually on the basis of a postulated mechanism of action) in the hope of improving outcomes. For example, during the 2003 epidemic of the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), several small observational studies examined the use of interferon, ribavirin, steroids, and convalescent plasma.1 Unfortunately, the inability to implement properly designed trials precluded any clear demonstration of benefit, and some evaluations suggested possible harm.

full text

http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp1508708?af=R&rss=currentIssue&
 
Back
Top Bottom