• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Nurses' Attitudes towards Enforced Measures to Increase Influenza Vaccination: a Qualitative Study

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2016 Dec 10. doi: 10.1111/irv.12441. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]Nurses' Attitudes towards Enforced Measures to Increase Influenza Vaccination: a Qualitative Study.[/h] Pless A[SUP]1[/SUP], Shaw D[SUP]1[/SUP], McLennan S[SUP]2[/SUP], Elger B[SUP]1[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]BACKGROUND:[/h] Despite studies demonstrating that the annual influenza vaccination of healthcare workers reduces morbidity and mortality among vulnerable patients, vaccination rates remain very low, particularly in nursing staff. Educational programs have failed to improve rates, which has led to a diverse range of enforced approaches being advocated and implemented.
[h=4]OBJECTIVES:[/h] To examine the attitudes of non-vaccinated nursing staff towards various enforced measures aimed at increasing rates of influenza vaccination.
[h=4]METHODS:[/h] Semi-structured qualitative interviews with a purposive sample of 18 non-vaccinated nurses, working in units with high-risk patients at two hospitals in Switzerland. Analysis of interviews was done using conventional content analysis.
[h=4]RESULTS:[/h] Nurses were critical of enforced measures. However, measures that include an element of choice were perceived as more acceptable. Declination forms and mandatory vaccinations as part of the employment requirements were found to be the most accepted measures.
[h=4]CONCLUSION:[/h] The perception of choice is crucial to the acceptance of a measure. Respect for choice and autonomy has a positive effect on behavioural change. Mandatory influenza vaccination as a condition of new (and perhaps ongoing) employment could be a feasible, effective and ethical measure to increase vaccination rates among nurses who oppose vaccination. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] Enforced Measures; Healthcare Workers; Influenza; Nosocomial Infection; Qualitative Research; Vaccination

PMID: 27943585 DOI: 10.1111/irv.12441
[PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
 
Back
Top Bottom