• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Occupational vaccination of health care workers: uptake, attitudes and potential solutions

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Public Health. 2015 Mar 30. pii: S0033-3506(15)00098-0. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2015.02.031. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]Occupational vaccination of health care workers: uptake, attitudes and potential solutions.[/h] Little KE[SUP]1[/SUP], Goodridge S[SUP]2[/SUP], Lewis H[SUP]2[/SUP], Lingard SW[SUP]2[/SUP], Din S[SUP]3[/SUP], Tidley M[SUP]3[/SUP], Roberts RJ[SUP]4[/SUP], Williams NS[SUP]2[/SUP], Hayes S[SUP]5[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]OBJECTIVES:[/h] Occupational vaccination of health care workers is strongly recommended to prevent health care associated transmission but coverage in general remains suboptimal. The aim of this survey was to: 1. Estimate levels vaccination coverage for annual flu and MMR vaccines among hospital-based health care workers; 2. Explore the reasons behind low vaccination rates; and 3. Identify potential practical and policy solutions.
[h=4]STUDY DESIGN:[/h] A cross-sectional study.
[h=4]METHODS:[/h] An opportunistic survey was used to estimate MMR and flu vaccination coverage, and review attitudes and explore solutions. Staff from eight randomly selected wards, stratified by ward-level patient susceptibility, were invited to participate.
[h=4]RESULTS:[/h] In total 133 staff responded, an approximate response rate of 68%. Seventy one percent had ever received an MMR and 42% had received the most recent flu vaccination. Actively declining vaccination was more common for flu than MMR (29% and 7% respectively). Side-effects, insufficient knowledge and vaccine ineffectiveness were popular justifications for declining flu vaccination but not MMR. Not seeing vaccination as a professional responsibility was associated with declining flu vaccination (P < 0.001). Improving vaccination coverage with booster vaccines for new staff and immunity testing received strong support from staff working with vulnerable groups (82% and 74% respectively); 70% of this staff group also supported compulsory vaccination.
[h=4]CONCLUSIONS:[/h] Improving staff education may increase coverage. Clarification of the benefits of vaccination in specific staff groups may also improve uptake. Routine booster vaccinations and immunity testing were generally acceptable and compulsory vaccination of certain staff groups warrants further investigation.
Copyright ? 2015 The Royal Society for Public Health. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] Influenza; MMR; Occupational health; Policies; Vaccination

PMID: 25834928 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
 
Back
Top Bottom