• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Open Forum Infect Dis . Clinical Comparison of COVID Waves 2-5. An Inpatient Retrospective Comparative Analysis From Karachi, Pakistan

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Open Forum Infect Dis


. 2025 Feb 7;12(3):ofaf072.
doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaf072. eCollection 2025 Mar. Clinical Comparison of COVID Waves 2-5. An Inpatient Retrospective Comparative Analysis From Karachi, Pakistan

Muneeba Ahsan Sayeed[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Elisha Shalim[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Shaiza Farman[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Fizza Farooqui[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Beenish Syed[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Ishfaque Ahmed[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Anika Iqbal[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Aneel Kumar[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Raniyah Akhter[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Furkan Hyder[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Hasan Ali Shah[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Adeel Hussain[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Sarwat Rasheed[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Saba Afshan[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Rizwana Salik Nukrich[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Madiha Raza[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Haseeb U Rehman[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Abdul Razzaque Memon[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Abdul Wahid Rajput[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Muhammad Saeed Quraishy[SUP] 8 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

Background: Each coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) wave is unique in its clinical presentation and outcome. In this study, we compared the clinical characteristics and outcomes of COVID waves 2-5 in inpatient settings.
Methods: A retrospective study was conducted at the Sindh Infectious Diseases Hospital and Research Center on adult patients who were admitted with a positive COVID polymerase chain reaction from July 2020 to March 2022. SPSS 26 was used to analyze the data.
Results: A total of 3190 COVID-19 patients were admitted. Wave 2 had the highest percentage of discharges compared with mortality (81%; P = .0001). Cytokine release syndrome was most common in wave 3 (32.7%; P = .0001). Severe COVID on admission was predominant in wave 4 (79.4%; P = .0001), with the highest rates of intubation (27.1%; P = .0001), septic shock (24.3%; P = .0001), and disease progression (50.8%; P = .0001). In wave 5, the majority were elderly (median age, 68 years) and had mild COVID (22.4%; P = .0001), most had comorbidities (84.6%; P = .0001), and the ratio of acute kidney injury was high (29.2%; P = .0001). Mortality was lowest in wave 2 (18.9%; P = .0001) and highest in wave 4 (42.5%; P = .0001; odds ratio, 3.18; 95% CI, 2.6-3.8; compared with wave 2).
Conclusions: Each wave had some unique characteristics compared with other waves, with wave 4, driven by the Delta variant, being the deadliest one in terms of disease severity and outcomes.

Keywords: COVID; comparison; disease severity; outcome; waves.

 
Back
Top Bottom