• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Open Forum Infect Dis . Serologic Testing of US Blood Donations to Identify Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 and Other Coronaviruses

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Open Forum Infect Dis


. 2024 Jun 28;11(7):ofae351.
doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofae351. eCollection 2024 Jul. Serologic Testing of US Blood Donations to Identify Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 and Other Coronaviruses, December 2019 to July 2020

Kacie Grimm[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Paula Saá[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Narayanaiah Cheedarla[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Michael S Gerty[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Jamel A Groves[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Roger Y Dodd[SUP] 1 [/SUP], John Roback[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Susan L Stramer[SUP] 4 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

Background: The first coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) case in the United States was recognized on 19 January 2020, but the time of introduction of the virus into the United States is unknown. An existing sample cohort was examined for serologic evidence of early severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections.
Methods: A repository of 46 120 samples from healthy routine blood donors, representing 46 states and the District of Columbia, was tested for total antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid (anti-N) using a commercial test. All reactive samples were further tested using an experimental receptor-binding domain (RBD)-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Further testing was also conducted for anti-spike (anti-S) antibodies by commercial tests, experimental anti-S immunologic blocking, and for antibodies to the 4 human cold coronaviruses.
Results: Anti-N reactivity was observed in 92 tested samples (0.2%), 91 of which had adequate volume for further testing; of these, 55 were confirmed positive by anti-RBD. None of these reactive findings were attributable to the other human coronaviruses tested. The confirmed-positive frequency increased over time paralleling patterns observed for COVID-19 cases reported in the United States (in contrast to stable patterns over time for the cold coronaviruses). Nine confirmed positive samples (0.07%) were identified among the 13 364 donations collected between 13 December 2019 and 22 January 2020. None of these early confirmed-positive samples were reactive by commercial anti-S tests suggesting very recent infection.
Conclusions: The samples tested in this study were broadly representative of the United States, and all were from individuals who had successfully donated blood. The antibody-reactive results of this study suggest that SARS-CoV-2 was likely present in the United States before 19 January 2020.

Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; antibody detection; blood donors; early seroprevalence.

 
Back
Top Bottom