• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Open Forum Infect Dis . The Clinical and Radiological Manifestations in Coronavirus Disease 2019 With Negative Nucleic Acid Results

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Open Forum Infect Dis


. 2020 Jun 25;7(7):ofaa252.
doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaa252. eCollection 2020 Jul.
The Clinical and Radiological Manifestations in Coronavirus Disease 2019 With Negative Nucleic Acid Results


Guanjing Lang[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Junwei Su[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Wenrui Wu[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Hong Zhao[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Shihong Ying[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Haiyan Lou[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Xiaomin Shen[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Michael T Yin[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Kaijin Xu[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jun Liu[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Cheng Ren[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jifang Sheng[SUP] 1 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was a new emerging disease with high infectiousness. Its diagnosis primarily depended on real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) results. This study investigated epidemiological, clinical, and radiological characteristics of COVID-19 with negative RT-PCR results before confirmation.
Methods: Patients with COVID-19 were enrolled and divided into 2 groups: a negative group with negative RT-PCR results before confirmation and a positive group with positive results at the first detection. Epidemiological and clinical features were compared. Dynamic chest computerized tomography (CT) images of the negative group were evaluated.
Results: Ninety-nine laboratory-confirmed patients with COVID-19 including 8 patients (8%) with negative RT-PCR results were included. Patients from the negative group had similar epidemiological features: the average age (50.25 ? 13.27 years in the negative group and 53.70 ? 16.64 years in the positive group) and gender distribution (males made up 50% of the negative group and 62.6% of the positive group) were comparable. No significant differences were observed in clinical symptoms between the 2 groups. We found that fever was the most common symptom for both groups, followed by cough, expectoration, chest distress, fatigue, and gastroenterological symptoms. Moreover, ground-glass opacities and consolidations were the main manifestation in chest CT of patients with COVID-19 with or without confirmed RT-PCR results.
Conclusions: Regardless of initial RT-PCR results, patients with COVID-19 had similar epidemiological, clinical, and chest CT features. Our study suggests value from early chest CT scans in COVID-19 screening and dynamic significance of radiology in disease monitoring should guide clinical decisions.

Keywords: COVID-19; RT-PCR; SARS-CoV-2; chest CT; early diagnosis.
 
Back
Top Bottom