• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Pandemic Influenza H1N1: Reconciling Serosurvey Data With Estimates of the Reproduction Number

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Epidemiology. 2011 Nov 14. [Epub ahead of print]
Pandemic Influenza H1N1: Reconciling Serosurvey Data With Estimates of the Reproduction Number.
Glass K, Kelly H, Mercer GN.
Source

From the aNational Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia; and bEpidemiology Unit, Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory, Melbourne, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:

During the 2009 pandemic of influenza A (H1N1), many studies reported estimates of the reproduction number from outbreak data. Since then, seroprevalence studies have been conducted in a number of countries to assess the proportion of the population that was infected in the first wave of the pandemic.
METHODS:

Here, we collate the reproduction number estimates, and use mathematical models to reconcile these with serosurvey data.
RESULTS:

Most estimates of the reproduction number from outbreaks are in the range of 1.0-2.0, whereas mean estimates calculated from seroprevalence data range from 1.14 to 1.36. Age-specific analysis of these data suggests that the reproduction number for children was approximately 1.6, whereas the reproduction numbers for adults >25 years of age was less than 1.0.
CONCLUSION:

The difference between age-groups may help to explain high estimates of the reproduction number from outbreaks involving a large proportion of child cases.

PMID:
22089631
[PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22089631
 
Back
Top Bottom