• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Parallel validation of three molecular devices for simultaneous detection and identification of influenza A, B and respiratory syncytial viruses

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Clin Microbiol. 2017 Dec 20. pii: JCM.01691-17. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01691-17. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]Parallel validation of three molecular devices for simultaneous detection and identification of influenza A, B and respiratory syncytial viruses.[/h] Ling L[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2[/SUP], Kaplan SE[SUP]2[/SUP], Lopez JC[SUP]2[/SUP], Stiles J[SUP]2[/SUP], Lu X[SUP]1[/SUP], Tang YW[SUP]3,[/SUP][SUP]2[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] Rapid identification of respiratory pathogens such as influenza viruses A (FluA), B (FluB) and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) reduces unnecessary antimicrobial use and enhances infection control practice. We performed a comparative evaluation of three molecular methods; 1) ARIES Flu A/B & RSV, 2) Xpert Xpress Flu/RSV and 3) Cobas Flu A/B & RSV. The clinical performance of the three methods was evaluated using 200 remnant nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) specimens against a combined reference standard. The limits of detection (LODs) of the ARIES and the Xpert Xpress assays were determined using titer-known FluA, FluB, and RSV control strains. The 95% limits of detection were between 1.702 and 0.0003 TCID50 with no significant differences revealed among the three assays. Perfect qualitative detection agreement was obtained in the reproducibility study. The Cobas failed at the first run on 13 clinical specimens, resulting in an invalid rate of 6.5%. Sensitivities and specificities for all assays were 96.0-100.0% and 99.3-100% for all three viruses. For on-demand single-specimen and batched 12-specimen workflows, test turnaround time was 115.5 and 128.8 min for the ARIES (12 sample capacity), 34.2 and 44.2 min for the Xpress (16 sample capacity), and 21.0 and 254.4 min for the Cobas (one instrument), respectively. In summary, the ARIES, Xpress and Cobas Liat assays demonstrated excellent sensitivities and specificities for simultaneous detection and identification of FluA, FluB and RSV from NPS specimens in cancer patients. Test turnaround time was significantly shorter on the Xpress when instrument scalability is unlimited.


PMID: 29263204 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01691-17
 
Back
Top Bottom