tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Microb Pathog. 2016 Apr 4. pii: S0882-4010(15)30077-2. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2016.04.006. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]Partial heterologous protection by low pathogenic H9N2 virus against natural H9N2-PB1 gene reassortant highly pathogenic H5N1 virus in chickens.[/h] Dash SK[SUP]1[/SUP], Kumar M[SUP]2[/SUP], Kataria JM[SUP]3[/SUP], Nagarajan S[SUP]1[/SUP], Tosh C[SUP]1[/SUP], Murugkar HV[SUP]1[/SUP], Kulkarni DD[SUP]1[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]
[h=3]Abstract[/h] Low pathogenic avian influenza H9N2 and highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 viruses continue to co-circulate in chickens. Prior infection with low pathogenic avian influenza can modulate the outcome of H5N1 infection. In India, low pathogenic H9N2 and highly pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza viruses are co-circulating in poultry. Herein, by using chickens with prior infection of A/chicken/India/04TI05/2012 (H9N2) virus we explored the outcome of infection with H5N1 virus A/turkey/India/10CA03/2012 natural PB1 gene reassortant from H9N2. Four groups (E1-E4) of SPF chickens (n=6) prior inoculated with 10[SUP]6[/SUP] EID[SUB]50[/SUB] of H9N2 virus were challenged with 10[SUP]6[/SUP] EID[SUB]50[/SUB] of H5N1 natural reassortant (PB1-H9N2) virus at days 1 (group E1); 3 (group E2); 7 (group E3) and 14 (group E4) post H9N2 inoculation. The survival percentage in groups E1-E4 was 0, 100, 66.6 and 50%, respectively. Virus shedding periods for groups E1-E4 were 3, 4, 7 and 9 days, respectively post H5N1 challenge. Birds of group E1 and E2 were shedding both H9N2 and H5N1 viruses and mean viral RNA copy number was higher in oropharyngeal swabs than cloacal swabs. In group, E3 and E4 birds excreted only H5N1 virus and mean viral RNA copy number was higher in most cloacal swabs than oral swabs. These results indicate that prior infection with H9N2 virus could protect from lethal challenge of reassortant H5N1 virus as early as with three days prior H9N2 inoculation and protection decreased in groups E3 and E4 as time elapsed. However, prior infection with H9N2 did not prevent infection with H5N1 virus and birds continue to excrete virus in oropharyngeal and cloacal swabs. Amino acid substitution K368E was found in HA gene of excreted H5N1 virus of group E3. Hence, concurrent infection can also cause emergence of viruses with mutations leading to virus evolution. The results of this study are important for the surveillance and epidemiological data analysis where both H9N2 and H5N1 viruses are co-circulating.
Copyright ? 2016. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] Avian influenza; Concurrent infection; H9N2; RNA copy number; Reassortant H5N1; Viral RNA shedding; antibody; mutation
PMID: 27057675 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
[h=1]Partial heterologous protection by low pathogenic H9N2 virus against natural H9N2-PB1 gene reassortant highly pathogenic H5N1 virus in chickens.[/h] Dash SK[SUP]1[/SUP], Kumar M[SUP]2[/SUP], Kataria JM[SUP]3[/SUP], Nagarajan S[SUP]1[/SUP], Tosh C[SUP]1[/SUP], Murugkar HV[SUP]1[/SUP], Kulkarni DD[SUP]1[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]
[h=3]Abstract[/h] Low pathogenic avian influenza H9N2 and highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 viruses continue to co-circulate in chickens. Prior infection with low pathogenic avian influenza can modulate the outcome of H5N1 infection. In India, low pathogenic H9N2 and highly pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza viruses are co-circulating in poultry. Herein, by using chickens with prior infection of A/chicken/India/04TI05/2012 (H9N2) virus we explored the outcome of infection with H5N1 virus A/turkey/India/10CA03/2012 natural PB1 gene reassortant from H9N2. Four groups (E1-E4) of SPF chickens (n=6) prior inoculated with 10[SUP]6[/SUP] EID[SUB]50[/SUB] of H9N2 virus were challenged with 10[SUP]6[/SUP] EID[SUB]50[/SUB] of H5N1 natural reassortant (PB1-H9N2) virus at days 1 (group E1); 3 (group E2); 7 (group E3) and 14 (group E4) post H9N2 inoculation. The survival percentage in groups E1-E4 was 0, 100, 66.6 and 50%, respectively. Virus shedding periods for groups E1-E4 were 3, 4, 7 and 9 days, respectively post H5N1 challenge. Birds of group E1 and E2 were shedding both H9N2 and H5N1 viruses and mean viral RNA copy number was higher in oropharyngeal swabs than cloacal swabs. In group, E3 and E4 birds excreted only H5N1 virus and mean viral RNA copy number was higher in most cloacal swabs than oral swabs. These results indicate that prior infection with H9N2 virus could protect from lethal challenge of reassortant H5N1 virus as early as with three days prior H9N2 inoculation and protection decreased in groups E3 and E4 as time elapsed. However, prior infection with H9N2 did not prevent infection with H5N1 virus and birds continue to excrete virus in oropharyngeal and cloacal swabs. Amino acid substitution K368E was found in HA gene of excreted H5N1 virus of group E3. Hence, concurrent infection can also cause emergence of viruses with mutations leading to virus evolution. The results of this study are important for the surveillance and epidemiological data analysis where both H9N2 and H5N1 viruses are co-circulating.
Copyright ? 2016. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] Avian influenza; Concurrent infection; H9N2; RNA copy number; Reassortant H5N1; Viral RNA shedding; antibody; mutation
PMID: 27057675 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]