• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Patient, physician, encounter, and billing characteristics predict the accuracy of syndromic surveillance case definitions

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
BMC Public Health. 2012 Mar 8;12(1):166. [Epub ahead of print]
Patient, physician, encounter, and billing characteristics predict the accuracy of syndromic surveillance case definitions.
Cadieux G, Buckeridge DL, Jacques A, Libman M, Dendukuri N, Tamblyn R.
Abstract

ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND:

Syndromic surveillance systems are plagued by high false-positive rates. In chronic disease monitoring, investigators have identified several factors that predict the accuracy of case definitions based on diagnoses in administrative data, and some have even incorporated these predictors into novel case detection methods, resulting in a significant improvement in case definition accuracy. Based on findings from these studies, we sought to identify physician, patient, encounter, and billing characteristics associated with the positive predictive value (PPV) of case definitions for 5 syndromes (fever, gastrointestinal, neurological, rash, and respiratory (including influenza-like illness)).
METHODS:

The study sample comprised 4,330 syndrome-positive visits from the claims of 1,098 randomly-selected physicians working in Quebec, Canada in 2005-2007. For each visit, physician-facilitated chart review was used to assess whether the same syndrome was present in the medical chart (gold standard). We used multivariate logistic regression analyses to estimate the association between claim-chart agreement about the presence of a syndrome and physician, patient, encounter, and billing characteristics.
RESULTS:

The likelihood of the medical chart agreeing with the physician claim about the presence of a syndrome was higher when the treating physician had billed many visits for the same syndrome recently (OR per 10 visit, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01-1.08), had a lower workload (OR per 10 claims, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.90-0.97), and when the patient was younger (OR per 5 years of age, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.94-0.97), and less socially deprived (OR most versus least deprived, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.60-0.95).
CONCLUSIONS:

Many physician, patient, encounter, and billing characteristics associated with the PPV of surveillance case definition are accessible to public health, and could be used to reduce false-positive alerts by surveillance systems, either by focusing on the data most likely to be accurate, or by adjusting the observed data for known biases in diagnosis reporting and performing surveillance using the adjusted values.

PMID:
22397597
[PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22397597
 
Back
Top Bottom