tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Pediatrics
. 2023 Jul 1;152(Suppl 1):e2022060352D.
doi: 10.1542/peds.2022-060352D. Acceptability and Feasibility of Saliva-delivered PCR Coronavirus 2019 Tests for Young Children
Rebecca E Lee[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Michael Todd[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Hyunsung Oh[SUP] 3 [/SUP], SeungYong Han[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Michelle Santana[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jaquelyn Aguilar-Troncoso[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Meg Bruening[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Joanna L Kramer[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Tomás León[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Vel Murugan[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Hector Valdez[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Michelle Villegas-Gold[SUP] 8 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Objectives: Access to readily available, reliable, and easy-to-use coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) tests remains critical, despite great vaccination progress. Universal back-to-school testing offered at early care and education ([ECE]; ie, preschool) sites to screen for positive cases may help preschoolers safely return to, and stay in, ECE. We examined the acceptability and feasibility of using a quantitative polymerase chain reaction COVID-19 saliva test for young children (n = 227, 54.0% girls: mean age = 52.3 ± 8.1 months) and their caregivers (n = 70 teachers: mean = 36.6 ± 14.7 years; n = 227 parents: mean = 35.5 ± 9.1 years) to mitigate the spread of COVID-19 and reduce days of school and work missed for households with children who test positive.
Methods: Participants were recruited at ECE sites serving low-income communities as part of the Rapid Acceleration of Diagnostic Testing-Underserved Populations Back to Early Care and Education Safely with Sustainability via Active Garden Education project (NCT05178290).
Results: Surveys in English or Spanish administered at testing events to children and caregivers at ECE sites showed child and adult acceptability and feasibility ratings were generally high. More favorable child and parent ratings were positively associated with child age and whether the child was able to produce a saliva sample. Language preference was not associated with any outcomes.
Conclusions: Saliva sampling for COVID-19 at ECE sites is an acceptable strategy as an additional layer of protection for 4- and 5-year-olds; however, alternate testing strategies may be needed for younger children.
. 2023 Jul 1;152(Suppl 1):e2022060352D.
doi: 10.1542/peds.2022-060352D. Acceptability and Feasibility of Saliva-delivered PCR Coronavirus 2019 Tests for Young Children
Rebecca E Lee[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Michael Todd[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Hyunsung Oh[SUP] 3 [/SUP], SeungYong Han[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Michelle Santana[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jaquelyn Aguilar-Troncoso[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Meg Bruening[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Joanna L Kramer[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Tomás León[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Vel Murugan[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Hector Valdez[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Michelle Villegas-Gold[SUP] 8 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 37394507
- PMCID: PMC10312283
- DOI: 10.1542/peds.2022-060352D
Objectives: Access to readily available, reliable, and easy-to-use coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) tests remains critical, despite great vaccination progress. Universal back-to-school testing offered at early care and education ([ECE]; ie, preschool) sites to screen for positive cases may help preschoolers safely return to, and stay in, ECE. We examined the acceptability and feasibility of using a quantitative polymerase chain reaction COVID-19 saliva test for young children (n = 227, 54.0% girls: mean age = 52.3 ± 8.1 months) and their caregivers (n = 70 teachers: mean = 36.6 ± 14.7 years; n = 227 parents: mean = 35.5 ± 9.1 years) to mitigate the spread of COVID-19 and reduce days of school and work missed for households with children who test positive.
Methods: Participants were recruited at ECE sites serving low-income communities as part of the Rapid Acceleration of Diagnostic Testing-Underserved Populations Back to Early Care and Education Safely with Sustainability via Active Garden Education project (NCT05178290).
Results: Surveys in English or Spanish administered at testing events to children and caregivers at ECE sites showed child and adult acceptability and feasibility ratings were generally high. More favorable child and parent ratings were positively associated with child age and whether the child was able to produce a saliva sample. Language preference was not associated with any outcomes.
Conclusions: Saliva sampling for COVID-19 at ECE sites is an acceptable strategy as an additional layer of protection for 4- and 5-year-olds; however, alternate testing strategies may be needed for younger children.