• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

PLoS ONE. Adverse Events Following Pandemic A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccines in Pregnant Women ? Taiwan, November 2009?August 2010

Giuseppe

Emeritus
[Source: PLoS ONE, full text: (LINK). Abstract, edited.]

Adverse Events Following Pandemic A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccines in Pregnant Women ? Taiwan, November 2009?August 2010



by Wan-Ting Huang, Wan-Chin Chen, Hwa-Jen Teng, Wei-I Huang, Yu-Wen Huang, Chien-Wen Hsu, Jen-Hsiang Chuang


Background

During the 2009 H1N1 pandemic, pregnant women were prioritized to receive the unadjuvanted or MF59?-adjuvanted pandemic A (H1N1) 2009 monovalent vaccines (?2009 H1N1 vaccines?) in Taiwan regardless of stage of pregnancy. Monitoring adverse events following 2009 H1N1 vaccination in pregnant women was a priority for the mass immunization campaign beginning November 2009.


Methods/Findings

We characterized reports to the national passive surveillance from November 2009 through August 2010 involving adverse events following 2009 H1N1 vaccines among pregnant women. Reports from the passive surveillance were matched to a large-linked database on a unique identifier, date of vaccination, and date of diagnosis in a capture-recapture analysis to estimate the true number of spontaneous abortion after 2009 H1N1 vaccination. We verified 16 spontaneous abortions, 11 stillbirths, 4 neonatal deaths, 4 nonpregnancy-specific adverse events, and 2 inadvertent immunizations in recipients who were unaware of pregnancy at time of vaccination. The Chapman capture-recapture estimator of true number of spontaneous abortion after 2009 H1N1 vaccination was 329 (95% confidence interval [CI] 196?553). Of the 14,474 pregnant women who received the 2009 H1N1 vaccines, the estimated risk of spontaneous abortion was 2.3 (95% CI, 1.4?3.8) per 100 pregnancies, compared with a local background rate of 12.8 (95% CI, 12.8?12.9) per 100 pregnancies.


Conclusions
The passive surveillance provided rapid initial assessment of adverse events after 2009 H1N1 vaccination among pregnant women. Its findings were reassuring for the safety of 2009 H1N1 vaccines in pregnancy.
- -------
 
Back
Top Bottom