• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

PLoS One . Antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in patients with differing severities of coronavirus disease 2019

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
PLoS One


. 2020 Oct 9;15(10):e0240502.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240502. eCollection 2020.
Antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in patients with differing severities of coronavirus disease 2019


Ekasit Kowitdamrong[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Thanyawee Puthanakit[SUP] 3 4 [/SUP], Watsamon Jantarabenjakul[SUP] 3 4 5 [/SUP], Eakachai Prompetchara[SUP] 6 7 [/SUP], Pintip Suchartlikitwong[SUP] 1 4 [/SUP], Opass Putcharoen[SUP] 5 8 [/SUP], Nattiya Hirankarn[SUP] 1 9 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Background: A greater understanding of the antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 in an infected population is important for the development of a vaccination.
Aim: To investigate SARS-CoV-2 IgA and IgG antibodies in Thai patients with differing severities of COVID-19.
Methods: Plasma from the following patient groups was examined: 118 adult patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections, 49 patients under investigation (without confirmed infections), 20 patients with other respiratory infections, and 102 healthy control patients. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) from EUROIMMUN was performed to assess for IgA and IgG antibodies. The optical density (OD) ratio cutoff for a positive result was 1.1 for IgA and 0.8 for IgG. Additionally, the association of the antibody response with both the severity of disease and the date after onset of symptoms was analyzed.
Results: A total of 289 participants were enrolled and 384 samples analyzed from March 10 to May 31, 2020. Patients were categorized, based on their clinical manifestations, as mild (n = 59), moderate (n = 27), or severe (n = 32). The overall sensitivity of IgA and IgG from the samples collected after day 7 of the symptoms was 87.9% (95% CI: 79.8-93.6) and 84.8% (95% CI: 76.2-91.3), respectively. Compared to the mild group, the severe group had significantly higher levels of spike 1 (S1) antigen-specific IgA and IgG. All patients in the moderate and severe groups had S1-specific IgG, while 20% of the patients in the mild group did not have any IgG detected after two weeks after the onset of symptoms. Interestingly, in the severe group, the SARS-CoV-2 IgG level was significantly higher in males than females (p = 0.003).
Conclusion: The serological test for SARS-CoV-2 has a high sensitivity more than two weeks after the onset of illness. Additionally, the serological response differs among patients based on sex as well as the severity of infection.
 
Back
Top Bottom