• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

PLoS ONE: Avian Influenza A Virus in Wild Birds in Highly Urbanized Areas

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Citation: Verhagen JH, Munster VJ, Majoor F, Lexmond P, Vuong O, et al. (2012) Avian Influenza A Virus in Wild Birds in Highly Urbanized Areas. PLoS ONE 7(6): e38256. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0038256

Josanne H. Verhagen1, Vincent J. Munster2, Frank Majoor3, Pascal Lexmond1, Oanh Vuong1, Job B. G. Stumpel1?, Guus F. Rimmelzwaan1, Albert D. M. E. Osterhaus1, Martin Schutten1, Roy Slaterus3, Ron A. M. Fouchier1*

1 National Influenza Center and Department of Virology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 2 Laboratory of Virology, Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Hamilton, Montana, United States of America, 3 Sovon Dutch Centre for Field Ornithology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Abstract Top

Avian influenza virus (AIV) surveillance studies in wild birds are usually conducted in rural areas and nature reserves. Less is known of avian influenza virus prevalence in wild birds located in densely populated urban areas, while these birds are more likely to be in close contact with humans. Influenza virus prevalence was investigated in 6059 wild birds sampled in cities in the Netherlands between 2006 and 2009, and compared with parallel AIV surveillance data from low urbanized areas in the Netherlands. Viral prevalence varied with the level of urbanization, with highest prevalence in low urbanized areas. Within cities virus was detected in 0.5% of birds, while seroprevalence exceeded 50%. Ring recoveries of urban wild birds sampled for virus detection demonstrated that most birds were sighted within the same city, while few were sighted in other cities or migrated up to 2659 km away from the sample location in the Netherlands. Here we show that urban birds were infected with AIVs and that urban birds were not separated completely from populations of long-distance migrants. The latter suggests that wild birds in cities may play a role in the introduction of AIVs into cities. Thus, urban bird populations should not be excluded as a human-animal interface for influenza viruses.


http://www.plosone.org/article/info...S+ONE+Alerts:+Public+Health+and+Epidemiology)
 
Back
Top Bottom