tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
PLoS One
. 2023 Sep 26;18(9):e0291580.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291580. eCollection 2023. Comparing methods to classify admitted patients with SARS-CoV-2 as admitted for COVID-19 versus with incidental SARS-CoV-2: A cohort study
Corinne M Hohl[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Amber Cragg[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Elizabeth Purssel[SUP] 1 3 [/SUP], Finlay A McAlister[SUP] 4 5 [/SUP], Daniel K Ting[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Frank Scheuermeyer[SUP] 1 6 [/SUP], Maja Stachura[SUP] 1 7 [/SUP], Lars Grant[SUP] 8 9 [/SUP], John Taylor[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Josephine Kanu[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jeffrey P Hau[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Ivy Cheng[SUP] 10 11 [/SUP], Clare L Atzema[SUP] 10 12 13 [/SUP], Rajan Bola[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Laurie J Morrison[SUP] 11 13 [/SUP], Megan Landes[SUP] 11 14 [/SUP], Jeffrey J Perry[SUP] 15 16 [/SUP], Rhonda J Rosychuk[SUP] 17 [/SUP]; Canadian COVID-19 Emergency Department Rapid Response Network (CCEDRRN) investigators for the Network of Canadian Emergency Researchers; Canadian Critical Care Trials Group
Affiliations
Introduction: Not all patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection develop symptomatic coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), making it challenging to assess the burden of COVID-19-related hospitalizations and mortality. We aimed to determine the proportion, resource utilization, and outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 positive patients admitted for COVID-19, and assess the impact of using the Center for Disease Control's (CDC) discharge diagnosis-based algorithm and the Massachusetts state department's drug administration-based classification system on identifying admissions for COVID-19.
Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we enrolled consecutive SARS-CoV-2 positive patients admitted to one of five hospitals in British Columbia between December 19, 2021 and May 31,2022. We completed medical record reviews, and classified hospitalizations as being primarily for COVID-19 or with incidental SARS-CoV-2 infection. We applied the CDC algorithm and the Massachusetts classification to estimate the difference in hospital days, intensive care unit (ICU) days and in-hospital mortality and calculated sensitivity and specificity.
Results: Of 42,505 Emergency Department patients, 1,651 were admitted and tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, with 858 (52.0%, 95% CI 49.6-54.4) admitted for COVID-19. Patients hospitalized for COVID-19 required ICU admission (14.0% versus 8.2%, p<0.001) and died (12.6% versus 6.4%, p<0.001) more frequently compared with patients with incidental SARS-CoV-2. Compared to case classification by clinicians, the CDC algorithm had a sensitivity of 82.9% (711/858, 95% CI 80.3%, 85.4%) and specificity of 98.1% (778/793, 95% CI 97.2%, 99.1%) for COVID-19-related admissions and underestimated COVID-19 attributable hospital days. The Massachusetts classification had a sensitivity of 60.5% (519/858, 95% CI 57.2%, 63.8%) and specificity of 78.6% (623/793, 95% CI 75.7%, 81.4%) for COVID-19-related admissions, underestimating total number of hospital and ICU bed days while overestimating COVID-19-related intubations, ICU admissions, and deaths.
Conclusion: Half of SARS-CoV-2 hospitalizations were for COVID-19 during the Omicron wave. The CDC algorithm was more specific and sensitive than the Massachusetts classification, but underestimated the burden of COVID-19 admissions.
Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04702945.
. 2023 Sep 26;18(9):e0291580.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291580. eCollection 2023. Comparing methods to classify admitted patients with SARS-CoV-2 as admitted for COVID-19 versus with incidental SARS-CoV-2: A cohort study
Corinne M Hohl[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Amber Cragg[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Elizabeth Purssel[SUP] 1 3 [/SUP], Finlay A McAlister[SUP] 4 5 [/SUP], Daniel K Ting[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Frank Scheuermeyer[SUP] 1 6 [/SUP], Maja Stachura[SUP] 1 7 [/SUP], Lars Grant[SUP] 8 9 [/SUP], John Taylor[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Josephine Kanu[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jeffrey P Hau[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Ivy Cheng[SUP] 10 11 [/SUP], Clare L Atzema[SUP] 10 12 13 [/SUP], Rajan Bola[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Laurie J Morrison[SUP] 11 13 [/SUP], Megan Landes[SUP] 11 14 [/SUP], Jeffrey J Perry[SUP] 15 16 [/SUP], Rhonda J Rosychuk[SUP] 17 [/SUP]; Canadian COVID-19 Emergency Department Rapid Response Network (CCEDRRN) investigators for the Network of Canadian Emergency Researchers; Canadian Critical Care Trials Group
Affiliations
- PMID: 37751455
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291580
Introduction: Not all patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection develop symptomatic coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), making it challenging to assess the burden of COVID-19-related hospitalizations and mortality. We aimed to determine the proportion, resource utilization, and outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 positive patients admitted for COVID-19, and assess the impact of using the Center for Disease Control's (CDC) discharge diagnosis-based algorithm and the Massachusetts state department's drug administration-based classification system on identifying admissions for COVID-19.
Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we enrolled consecutive SARS-CoV-2 positive patients admitted to one of five hospitals in British Columbia between December 19, 2021 and May 31,2022. We completed medical record reviews, and classified hospitalizations as being primarily for COVID-19 or with incidental SARS-CoV-2 infection. We applied the CDC algorithm and the Massachusetts classification to estimate the difference in hospital days, intensive care unit (ICU) days and in-hospital mortality and calculated sensitivity and specificity.
Results: Of 42,505 Emergency Department patients, 1,651 were admitted and tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, with 858 (52.0%, 95% CI 49.6-54.4) admitted for COVID-19. Patients hospitalized for COVID-19 required ICU admission (14.0% versus 8.2%, p<0.001) and died (12.6% versus 6.4%, p<0.001) more frequently compared with patients with incidental SARS-CoV-2. Compared to case classification by clinicians, the CDC algorithm had a sensitivity of 82.9% (711/858, 95% CI 80.3%, 85.4%) and specificity of 98.1% (778/793, 95% CI 97.2%, 99.1%) for COVID-19-related admissions and underestimated COVID-19 attributable hospital days. The Massachusetts classification had a sensitivity of 60.5% (519/858, 95% CI 57.2%, 63.8%) and specificity of 78.6% (623/793, 95% CI 75.7%, 81.4%) for COVID-19-related admissions, underestimating total number of hospital and ICU bed days while overestimating COVID-19-related intubations, ICU admissions, and deaths.
Conclusion: Half of SARS-CoV-2 hospitalizations were for COVID-19 during the Omicron wave. The CDC algorithm was more specific and sensitive than the Massachusetts classification, but underestimated the burden of COVID-19 admissions.
Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04702945.