• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

PLoS One . Comparison of post-discharge mortality and medical expenditures in COVID-19 patients according to mechanical ventilation and extracorpor

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
PLoS One


. 2026 Mar 26;21(3):e0345939.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0345939. eCollection 2026.
Comparison of post-discharge mortality and medical expenditures in COVID-19 patients according to mechanical ventilation and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation use: The LIFE study

Jun Kawabata[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Kenichi Goto[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Megumi Maeda[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Haruhisa Fukuda[SUP] 3 [/SUP]


Affiliations
Abstract

Outcomes related to health status and economic burden among patients who experienced critical COVID-19 remain insufficiently studied. We examined 180-day post-discharge mortality and total medical expenditures in COVID-19 patients according to their use of mechanical ventilation (MV) or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) during hospitalization. Using medical claims data from a Japanese municipality, this retrospective cohort study analyzed hospitalized COVID-19 patients who were discharged between April 1, 2020 and September 30, 2021. Patients were categorized into an MV/ECMO group (indicating severe disease) or a non-MV/ECMO group. Their differences in mortality and expenditures were compared using the χ2 test and Mann-Whitney U test, respectively. A Cox regression analysis was performed to calculate the hazard ratios of MV/ECMO use for mortality, and a generalized linear model with gamma distribution was constructed to examine the association between MV/ECMO use and expenditures. The covariates included age, sex, comorbidities, and length of stay. The MV/ECMO group had significantly higher mortality (16.0% vs. 11.1%, p = 0.002) and expenditures ($8,732 vs. $3,460, p < 0.001) than the non-MV/ECMO group. MV/ECMO use was significantly associated with higher mortality (hazard ratio: 1.66, 95% confidence interval: 1.27-2.15); other risk factors included age (1.06, 1.05-1.07), dementia (1.48, 1.10-1.99), and cancer (1.92, 1.56-2.36). MV/ECMO use was also significantly associated with higher expenditures (Exp[β]: 1.49, 95% confidence interval: 1.29-1.73); other risk factors included kidney disease (1.60, 1.29-2.01), cerebrovascular disease (1.74, 1.56-1.94), and cancer (1.28, 1.14-1.44). Survivors of severe COVID-19 who required MV or ECMO during hospitalization were associated with higher post-discharge mortality and expenditures, suggesting a need for targeted care to reduce their clinical and economic burden.


 
Back
Top Bottom