• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

PLoS One . Estimating the trend of COVID-19 in Norway by combining multiple surveillance indicators

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
PLoS One


. 2025 Jan 30;20(1):e0317105.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317105. eCollection 2025. Estimating the trend of COVID-19 in Norway by combining multiple surveillance indicators

Gunnar Rø[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Trude Marie Lyngstad[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Elina Seppälä[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Siri Nærland Skodvin[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Lill Trogstad[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Richard Aubrey White[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Arve Paulsen[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Trine Hessevik Paulsen[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Trine Skogset Ofitserova[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Petter Langlete[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Elisabeth Henie Madslien[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Karin Nygård[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Birgitte Freisleben de Blasio[SUP] 1 4 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

Estimating the trend of new infections was crucial for monitoring risk and for evaluating strategies and interventions during the COVID-19 pandemic. The pandemic revealed the utility of new data sources and highlighted challenges in interpreting surveillance indicators when changes in disease severity, testing practices or reporting occur. Our study aims to estimate the underlying trend in new COVID-19 infections by combining estimates of growth rates from all available surveillance indicators in Norway. We estimated growth rates by using a negative binomial regression method and aligned the growth rates in time to hospital admissions by maximising correlations. Using a meta-analysis framework, we calculated overall growth rates and reproduction numbers including assessments of the heterogeneity between indicators. We find that the estimated growth rates reached a maximum of 25% per day in March 2020, but afterwards they were between -10% and 10% per day. The correlations between the growth rates estimated from different indicators were between 0.5 and 1.0. Growth rates from indicators based on wastewater, panel and cohort data can give up to 14 days earlier signals of trends compared to hospital admissions, while indicators based on positive lab tests can give signals up to 7 days earlier. Combining estimates of growth rates from multiple surveillance indicators provides a useful description of the COVID-19 pandemic in Norway. This is a powerful technique for a holistic understanding of the trends of new COVID-19 infections and the technique can easily be adapted to new data sources and situations.


 
Back
Top Bottom