tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
PLoS One
. 2023 Feb 16;18(2):e0281884.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281884. eCollection 2023.
Living with "long COVID": A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative evidence
M Mahbub Hossain[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Jyoti Das[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Farzana Rahman[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Fazilatun Nesa[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Puspita Hossain[SUP] 5 6 [/SUP], A M Khairul Islam[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Samia Tasnim[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Farah Faizah[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Hoimonty Mazumder[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Neetu Purohit[SUP] 10 [/SUP], Gilbert Ramirez[SUP] 11 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Abstract
Objectives: Long-term health consequences of coronavirus disease (COVID-19), also known as "long COVID," has become a global health concern. In this systematic review, we aimed to synthesize the qualitative evidence on lived experiences of people living with long COVID that may inform health policymaking and practice.
Methods: We searched six major databases and additional sources and systematically retrieved relevant qualitative studies and conducted a meta-synthesis of key findings using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidelines and reporting standards of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) checklist.
Results: We found 15 articles representing 12 studies out of 619 citations from different sources. These studies provided 133 findings that were categorized into 55 categories. All categories were aggregated to the following synthesized findings: living with complex physical health problems, psychosocial crises of long COVID, slow recovery and rehabilitation, digital resources and information management, changes in social support, and experiences with healthcare providers, services, and systems. Ten studies were from the UK, and others were from Denmark and Italy, which highlights a critical lack of evidence from other countries.
Conclusions: More representative research is needed to understand long COVID-related experiences from diverse communities and populations. The available evidence informs a high burden of biopsychosocial challenges among people with long COVID that would require multilevel interventions such as strengthening health and social policies and services, engaging patients and caregivers in making decisions and developing resources, and addressing health and socioeconomic disparities associated with long COVID through evidence-based practice.
. 2023 Feb 16;18(2):e0281884.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281884. eCollection 2023.
Living with "long COVID": A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative evidence
M Mahbub Hossain[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Jyoti Das[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Farzana Rahman[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Fazilatun Nesa[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Puspita Hossain[SUP] 5 6 [/SUP], A M Khairul Islam[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Samia Tasnim[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Farah Faizah[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Hoimonty Mazumder[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Neetu Purohit[SUP] 10 [/SUP], Gilbert Ramirez[SUP] 11 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 36795701
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281884
Abstract
Objectives: Long-term health consequences of coronavirus disease (COVID-19), also known as "long COVID," has become a global health concern. In this systematic review, we aimed to synthesize the qualitative evidence on lived experiences of people living with long COVID that may inform health policymaking and practice.
Methods: We searched six major databases and additional sources and systematically retrieved relevant qualitative studies and conducted a meta-synthesis of key findings using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidelines and reporting standards of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) checklist.
Results: We found 15 articles representing 12 studies out of 619 citations from different sources. These studies provided 133 findings that were categorized into 55 categories. All categories were aggregated to the following synthesized findings: living with complex physical health problems, psychosocial crises of long COVID, slow recovery and rehabilitation, digital resources and information management, changes in social support, and experiences with healthcare providers, services, and systems. Ten studies were from the UK, and others were from Denmark and Italy, which highlights a critical lack of evidence from other countries.
Conclusions: More representative research is needed to understand long COVID-related experiences from diverse communities and populations. The available evidence informs a high burden of biopsychosocial challenges among people with long COVID that would require multilevel interventions such as strengthening health and social policies and services, engaging patients and caregivers in making decisions and developing resources, and addressing health and socioeconomic disparities associated with long COVID through evidence-based practice.