• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

PLoS One . Mixed methods approach to examining the implementation experience of a phone-based survey for a SARS-CoV-2 test-negative case-control st

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
PLoS One


. 2024 May 21;19(5):e0301070.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301070. eCollection 2024. Mixed methods approach to examining the implementation experience of a phone-based survey for a SARS-CoV-2 test-negative case-control study in California

Nozomi Fukui[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Sophia S Li[SUP] 1 3 [/SUP], Jennifer DeGuzman[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jennifer F Myers[SUP] 1 [/SUP], John Openshaw[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Anjali Sharma[SUP] 4 5 [/SUP], James Watt[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Joseph A Lewnard[SUP] 2 6 7 [/SUP], Seema Jain[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Kristin L Andrejko[SUP] 1 3 [/SUP], Jake M Pry[SUP] 1 8 [/SUP]; California COVID-19 Case-Control Study Team



Affiliations
Abstract

Objective: To describe the implementation of a test-negative design case-control study in California during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.
Study design: Test-negative case-control study.
Methods: Between February 24, 2021 - February 24, 2022, a team of 34 interviewers called 38,470 Californians, enrolling 1,885 that tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 (cases) and 1,871 testing negative for SARS-CoV-2 (controls) for 20-minute telephone survey. We estimated adjusted odds ratios for answering the phone and consenting to participate using mixed effects logistic regression. We used a web-based anonymous survey to compile interviewer experiences.
Results: Cases had 1.29-fold (95% CI: 1.24-1.35) higher adjusted odds of answering the phone and 1.69-fold (1.56-1.83) higher adjusted odds of consenting to participate compared to controls. Calls placed from 4pm to 6pm had the highest adjusted odds of being answered. Some interviewers experienced mental wellness challenges interacting with participants with physical (e.g., food, shelter, etc.) and emotional (e.g., grief counseling) needs, and enduring verbal harassment from individuals called.
Conclusions: Calls placed during afternoon hours may optimize response rate when enrolling controls to a case-control study during a public health emergency response. Proactive check-ins and continual collection of interviewer experience(s) and may help maintain mental wellbeing of investigation workforce. Remaining adaptive to the dynamic needs of the investigation team is critical to a successful study, especially in emergent public health crises, like that represented by the COVID-19 pandemic.


 
Back
Top Bottom