tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
PLoS One
. 2023 Oct 23;18(10):e0287953.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287953. eCollection 2023. Quantitative analysis of chest computed tomography of COVID-19 pneumonia using a software widely used in Japan
Minako Suzuki[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Yoshimi Fujii[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Yurie Nishimura[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Kazuma Yasui[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Hidefumi Fujisawa[SUP] 1 [/SUP]
Affiliations
This study aimed to determine the optimal conditions to measure the percentage of the area considered as pneumonia (pneumonia volume ratio [PVR]) and the computed tomography (CT) score due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) using the Ziostation2 image analysis software (Z2; Ziosoft, Tokyo, Japan), which is popular in Japan, and to evaluate its usefulness for assessing the clinical severity. We included 53 patients (41 men and 12 women, mean age: 61.3 years) diagnosed with COVID-19 using polymerase chain reaction who had undergone chest CT and were hospitalized between January 2020 and January 2021. Based on the COVID-19 infection severity, the patients were classified as mild (n = 38) or severe (n = 15). For 10 randomly selected samples, the PVR and CT scores by Z2 under different conditions and the visual simple PVR and CT scores were compared. The conditions with the highest statistical agreement were determined. The usefulness of the clinical severity assessment based on the PVR and CT scores using Z2 under the determined conditions was statistically evaluated. The best agreement with the visual measurement was achieved by the Z2 measurement condition of ≥-600 HU. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves, Youden's index, and the sensitivity, specificity, and p-values of the PVR and CT scores by Z2 were as follows: PVR: 0.881, 18.69, 66.7, 94.7, and <0.001; CT score: 0.77, 7.5, 40, 74, and 0.002, respectively. We determined the optimal condition for assessing the PVR of COVID-19 pneumonia using Z2 and demonstrated that the AUC of the PVR was higher than that of CT scores in the assessment of clinical severity. The introduction of new technologies is time-consuming and expensive; our method has high clinical utility and can be promptly used in any facility where Z2 has been introduced.
. 2023 Oct 23;18(10):e0287953.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287953. eCollection 2023. Quantitative analysis of chest computed tomography of COVID-19 pneumonia using a software widely used in Japan
Minako Suzuki[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Yoshimi Fujii[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Yurie Nishimura[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Kazuma Yasui[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Hidefumi Fujisawa[SUP] 1 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 37871048
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287953
This study aimed to determine the optimal conditions to measure the percentage of the area considered as pneumonia (pneumonia volume ratio [PVR]) and the computed tomography (CT) score due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) using the Ziostation2 image analysis software (Z2; Ziosoft, Tokyo, Japan), which is popular in Japan, and to evaluate its usefulness for assessing the clinical severity. We included 53 patients (41 men and 12 women, mean age: 61.3 years) diagnosed with COVID-19 using polymerase chain reaction who had undergone chest CT and were hospitalized between January 2020 and January 2021. Based on the COVID-19 infection severity, the patients were classified as mild (n = 38) or severe (n = 15). For 10 randomly selected samples, the PVR and CT scores by Z2 under different conditions and the visual simple PVR and CT scores were compared. The conditions with the highest statistical agreement were determined. The usefulness of the clinical severity assessment based on the PVR and CT scores using Z2 under the determined conditions was statistically evaluated. The best agreement with the visual measurement was achieved by the Z2 measurement condition of ≥-600 HU. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves, Youden's index, and the sensitivity, specificity, and p-values of the PVR and CT scores by Z2 were as follows: PVR: 0.881, 18.69, 66.7, 94.7, and <0.001; CT score: 0.77, 7.5, 40, 74, and 0.002, respectively. We determined the optimal condition for assessing the PVR of COVID-19 pneumonia using Z2 and demonstrated that the AUC of the PVR was higher than that of CT scores in the assessment of clinical severity. The introduction of new technologies is time-consuming and expensive; our method has high clinical utility and can be promptly used in any facility where Z2 has been introduced.