tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
PLoS One
. 2024 Jun 13;19(6):e0301785.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301785. eCollection 2024. The interaction of disease transmission, mortality, and economic output over the first 2 years of the COVID-19 pandemic
Christian Morgenstern[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Daniel J Laydon[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Charles Whittaker[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Swapnil Mishra[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], David Haw[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Samir Bhatt[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Neil M Ferguson[SUP] 1 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has caused over 7.02 million deaths as of January 2024 and profoundly affected most countries' Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Here, we study the interaction of SARS-CoV-2 transmission, mortality, and economic output between January 2020 and December 2022 across 25 European countries.
Methods: We use a Bayesian mixed effects model with auto-regressive terms to estimate the temporal relationships between disease transmission, excess deaths, changes in economic output, transit mobility and non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) across countries.
Results: Disease transmission intensity (logRt) decreases GDP and increases excess deaths, where the latter association is longer-lasting. Changes in GDP as well as prior week transmission intensity are both negatively associated with each other (-0.241, 95% CrI: -0.295 - -0.189). We find evidence of risk-averse behaviour, as changes in transit and prior week transmission intensity are negatively associated (-0.055, 95% CrI: -0.074 to -0.036). Our results highlight a complex cost-benefit trade-off from individual NPIs. For example, banning international travel is associated with both increases in GDP (0.014, 0.002-0.025) and decreases in excess deaths (-0.014, 95% CrI: -0.028 - -0.001). Country-specific random effects, such as the poverty rate, are positively associated with excess deaths while the UN government effectiveness index is negatively associated with excess deaths.
Interpretation: The interplay between transmission intensity, excess deaths, population mobility and economic output is highly complex, and none of these factors can be considered in isolation. Our results reinforce the intuitive idea that significant economic activity arises from diverse person-to-person interactions. Our analysis quantifies and highlights that the impact of disease on a given country is complex and multifaceted. Long-term economic impairments are not fully captured by our model, as well as long-term disease effects (Long COVID).
. 2024 Jun 13;19(6):e0301785.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301785. eCollection 2024. The interaction of disease transmission, mortality, and economic output over the first 2 years of the COVID-19 pandemic
Christian Morgenstern[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Daniel J Laydon[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Charles Whittaker[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Swapnil Mishra[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], David Haw[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Samir Bhatt[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Neil M Ferguson[SUP] 1 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 38870106
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301785
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has caused over 7.02 million deaths as of January 2024 and profoundly affected most countries' Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Here, we study the interaction of SARS-CoV-2 transmission, mortality, and economic output between January 2020 and December 2022 across 25 European countries.
Methods: We use a Bayesian mixed effects model with auto-regressive terms to estimate the temporal relationships between disease transmission, excess deaths, changes in economic output, transit mobility and non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) across countries.
Results: Disease transmission intensity (logRt) decreases GDP and increases excess deaths, where the latter association is longer-lasting. Changes in GDP as well as prior week transmission intensity are both negatively associated with each other (-0.241, 95% CrI: -0.295 - -0.189). We find evidence of risk-averse behaviour, as changes in transit and prior week transmission intensity are negatively associated (-0.055, 95% CrI: -0.074 to -0.036). Our results highlight a complex cost-benefit trade-off from individual NPIs. For example, banning international travel is associated with both increases in GDP (0.014, 0.002-0.025) and decreases in excess deaths (-0.014, 95% CrI: -0.028 - -0.001). Country-specific random effects, such as the poverty rate, are positively associated with excess deaths while the UN government effectiveness index is negatively associated with excess deaths.
Interpretation: The interplay between transmission intensity, excess deaths, population mobility and economic output is highly complex, and none of these factors can be considered in isolation. Our results reinforce the intuitive idea that significant economic activity arises from diverse person-to-person interactions. Our analysis quantifies and highlights that the impact of disease on a given country is complex and multifaceted. Long-term economic impairments are not fully captured by our model, as well as long-term disease effects (Long COVID).