• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A . Real-time pandemic surveillance using hospital admissions and mobility data

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A


. 2022 Feb 15;119(7):e2111870119.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.2111870119.
Real-time pandemic surveillance using hospital admissions and mobility data


Spencer J Fox[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Michael Lachmann[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Mauricio Tec[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Remy Pasco[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Spencer Woody[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Zhanwei Du[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Xutong Wang[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Tanvi A Ingle[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Emily Javan[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Maytal Dahan[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Kelly Gaither[SUP] 7 8 [/SUP], Mark E Escott[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Stephen I Adler[SUP] 10 [/SUP], S Claiborne Johnston[SUP] 11 [/SUP], James G Scott[SUP] 3 12 [/SUP], Lauren Ancel Meyers[SUP] 5 2 3 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Forecasting the burden of COVID-19 has been impeded by limitations in data, with case reporting biased by testing practices, death counts lagging far behind infections, and hospital census reflecting time-varying patient access, admission criteria, and demographics. Here, we show that hospital admissions coupled with mobility data can reliably predict severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) transmission rates and healthcare demand. Using a forecasting model that has guided mitigation policies in Austin, TX, we estimate that the local reproduction number had an initial 7-d average of 5.8 (95% credible interval [CrI]: 3.6 to 7.9) and reached a low of 0.65 (95% CrI: 0.52 to 0.77) after the summer 2020 surge. Estimated case detection rates ranged from 17.2% (95% CrI: 11.8 to 22.1%) at the outset to a high of 70% (95% CrI: 64 to 80%) in January 2021, and infection prevalence remained above 0.1% between April 2020 and March 1, 2021, peaking at 0.8% (0.7-0.9%) in early January 2021. As precautionary behaviors increased safety in public spaces, the relationship between mobility and transmission weakened. We estimate that mobility-associated transmission was 62% (95% CrI: 52 to 68%) lower in February 2021 compared to March 2020. In a retrospective comparison, the 95% CrIs of our 1, 2, and 3 wk ahead forecasts contained 93.6%, 89.9%, and 87.7% of reported data, respectively. Developed by a task force including scientists, public health officials, policy makers, and hospital executives, this model can reliably project COVID-19 healthcare needs in US cities.

Keywords: COVID-19; epidemiological data; forecasting; healthcare usage.
 
Back
Top Bottom