• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Profiles of influenza A/H1N1 vaccine response using hemagglutination-inhibition titers

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2015 Apr 2:0. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]Profiles of influenza A/H1N1 vaccine response using hemagglutination-inhibition titers.[/h] Jacobson RM[SUP]1[/SUP], Grill DE, Oberg AL, Tosh PK, Ovsyannikova IG, Poland GA.
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]PURPOSE:[/h] To identify distinct antibody profiles among adults 50-to-74 years old using influenza A/H1N1 HI titers up to 75 days after vaccination.
[h=4]METHODS:[/h] Healthy subjects 50 to 74 years old received the 2010-2011 trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine. We measured venous samples from Days 0, 28, and 75 for HI and VNA and B-cell ELISPOTs.
[h=4]RESULTS:[/h] Of 106 subjects, HI titers demonstrated a ceiling effect for 11 or 10% for those with a pre-vaccination HI titer of 1:640 where no subject post-vaccination had an increase in titer. Of the remaining 95 subjects, only 37 or 35% overall had at least a four-fold increase by Day 28. Of these 37, three waned at least four-fold, and 13 others two-fold. Thus 15% of the subjects showed waning antibody titers by Day 75. More than half failed to respond at all. The profiles populated by these subjects as defined by HI did not vary with age or gender. The VNA results mimicked the HI profiles, but the profiles for B-cell ELISPOT did not.
[h=4]DISCUSSION:[/h] HI titers at Days 0, 28, and 75 populate four biologically plausible profiles. Limitations include lack of consensus for operationally defining waning as well as for the apparent ceiling. Furthermore, though well accepted as a marker for vaccine response, assigning thresholds with HI has limitations. However, VNA closely matches HI in populating these profiles. Thus, we hold that these profiles, having face- and content-validity, may provide a basis for understanding variation in genomic and transcriptomic response to influenza vaccination in this age group.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] ASC Antibody-Secreting Cells; Aging; Antibodies; ELISPOT Enzyme-Linked ImmunoSpot; Et al. Et alia (and others); H1N1 Subtype; HI Hemagglutination-Inhibition; Hemagglutination Inhibition Tests; Hemagglutinin Glycoproteins; IQR Interquartile Range; IgG Immunoglobulin G; Influenza A Virus; Influenza Vaccines; Influenza Virus; MDCK Madin-Darby Canine Kidney; PFU Plaque-Forming Units; RBC Red Blood Cells; TCID50 Tissue Culture Infectious Dose 50; VNA Virus Neutralization Assay; Viral; WHO World Health Organization; p p-value; μl Microliters

PMID: 25835513 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
 
Back
Top Bottom